The toothpaste
Question

Sensitivity toothpaste for a single tooth: why one-tooth pain usually needs a dentist.

One tooth that has suddenly become sensitive needs a dentist's look before it needs a sensitivity toothpaste, because the trials behind those toothpastes recruited teeth already diagnosed as sensitivity, and no symptom check has been shown to tell sensitivity apart from a crack, decay or an inflamed nerve123. Keep brushing your whole mouth as normal with a fluoride toothpaste while you wait for the appointment, a sensitivity toothpaste included, but do not spend weeks testing a paste on that tooth first. S3 Sensitivity Science™, like every sensitivity toothpaste, is made as a complete daily toothpaste for twice-daily use across the whole mouth; it is not a test of what is wrong with one tooth.

What was checked18 peer-reviewed studies, guidance from the NHS and the Oral Health Foundation, and product information as published by S3 and by Sensodyne

Key points
  • S3's actives are potassium nitrate and two forms of hydroxyapatite. In the manufacturer-funded trials of potassium nitrate and nano-hydroxyapatite read for this page, every tooth enrolled had already been scored as sensitive by an examiner, and the exclusions ran from recently filled teeth and "teeth with pathology likely to cause pain" to, in one trial, decay and enamel cracks by name4561.
  • Whether one sore tooth is "just sensitivity" cannot be read from the pain. A validated pain questionnaire that covers both scores sensitive dentine and an inflamed but recoverable nerve as one group3. A 2012 systematic review of 18 diagnostic studies rated the evidence for judging the nerve from toothache or a reaction to heat or cold insufficient7.
  • Cold, the classic sensitivity trigger, was the commonest complaint from back teeth already known to be cracked in the largest practice-based study of them, so "it only hurts with cold" is no reassurance, even though it does not make a cold-sensitive tooth likely to be cracked8.
  • UK guidance already treats one tooth as a reason to be seen: the Oral Health Foundation lists a single affected tooth and pain that comes on suddenly among its reasons to see a dentist, and the NHS asks for a dentist when toothache has lasted more than two days, when painkillers do not help, or when it comes with pain on biting, a high temperature or a swollen cheek or jaw910.
  • Keep brushing the whole mouth as normal while you wait. S3 is judged at two to four weeks, a wait that suits a mouthful of ordinary sensitivity, not one tooth nobody has examined.

Why is one sensitive tooth a different question from a mouthful of them?

Because sensitivity is diagnosed by ruling other things out, and for a single tooth that has just started to hurt, nobody has ruled anything out yet.

The ruling-out is written into the definition. A 2013 overview of the diagnostic criteria describes dentine hypersensitivity as always a diagnosis of exclusion, confirmed only once the other possible causes have been eliminated, and lists the conditions that can produce the same symptoms: a cracked tooth, a fractured or leaking filling, a chipped tooth, decay in the crown or the root, sensitivity after dental treatment, pulpitis, inflamed gums, tooth whitening and atypical tooth pain2. The 1997 consensus guidelines for trials of desensitising products follow the same order1. People are selected on a clinical diagnosis of the condition, those with conflicting characteristics such as active dental treatment are left out, several sites may be scored in one person, and the preferred places to test are the cheek-facing surfaces of incisors, canines and premolars1.

Trials do not always manage that step. When a 2026 scoping review with a Delphi consensus went through 72 papers on how the condition is defined, few applied the whole of the accepted definition, and the part the review singled out as most often left incomplete was the exclusion of other causes of tooth pain11.

How many teeth does ordinary sensitivity involve? Published counts disagree, and the disagreement is more useful than an average. In a 2002 clinical screening study of 117 people examined as possible recruits for a desensitising toothpaste trial in London, 1,561 of 3,136 eligible teeth responded to a probe, a cold-air blast or both12. A population-based study of 2,120 adults in Shanghai, chosen by stratified random sampling and tested with cold air, reports 3.2 sensitive teeth per patient, with premolars making up 49.6% of them13. A population-based clinical study of 1,023 adults aged 35 and over in Porto Alegre, Brazil, examined at home, found that sensitivity affected about one tooth per affected person14. And in a cross-sectional clinical study at a Brazilian dental-school clinic, 51.7% of 118 patients had sensitivity, yet only 5.82% of the 2,902 teeth examined reacted to air15.

Each of those counted people differently, so no rule about one tooth falls out of them, and nothing here makes a single sensitive tooth proof that something else is wrong. The point is narrower. A sensitivity toothpaste comes with evidence gathered on people whose teeth were scored across the mouth after an examination, and a tooth that began hurting last week has had neither the scoring nor the examination. The page on one tooth that has suddenly become sensitive takes the usual culprits one at a time; this page stays with the toothpaste's side of the question.

What did the trials behind sensitivity toothpastes leave out?

Several of the things a single sore tooth might turn out to be, though not in every trial and never with the same list. The table copies the eligibility rules of four open-access trials, each read in full for this page, covering potassium nitrate, nano-hydroxyapatite, stannous fluoride, oxalate, aluminium lactate and calcium sodium phosphosilicate. Every one of them was run or funded by a toothpaste manufacturer, and the first column says which; that matters less than usual here, because the question is not what the trials found but which teeth they let in45616. The last two rows are the 1997 trial guidelines and the 2013 list of conditions a diagnosis of sensitivity is meant to rule out12.

Trial: design, size, who paid, yearActives testedIn S3's tube?Teeth it needed to enrolTeeth or people excluded, as the methods print themDecay named?Cracks named?Source
Double-blind randomised trial, 120 adults, United States; funded by Procter & Gamble, with seven of eight authors its employees; 2025A marketed potassium nitrate toothpaste; a stannous fluoride toothpaste; an experimental oxalate toothpaste; a control paste with fluoride and no desensitising activePotassium nitrate: yes. Stannous fluoride and oxalate: noTwo teeth scoring above 1 on the cold-air (Schiff) scale and 10–20 g on the probe; two qualifying teeth in one quadrant had to be at least two teeth apartPeriodontal surgery, orthodontic treatment or restorations in the previous 3 months; "teeth with pathology likely to cause pain"; a professional clean within 2 weeks; bleaching within 4 weeks; desensitising treatment within 6 weeks; any condition predisposing to sensitivityNot by nameNot by name4, full text of the randomised trial, section 2.1; industry-funded
Double-blind randomised trial, 105 adults recruited and 85 completing, United States; sponsor Sangi, which made the test pastes; 2021Nano-hydroxyapatite at two strengths; nano-hydroxyapatite with potassium nitrate; a calcium sodium phosphosilicate paste as comparatorNano-hydroxyapatite and potassium nitrate: yes. Calcium sodium phosphosilicate: noAt least one tooth with exposed dentine at the neck on the cheek side, scoring 20 mm or more on a 100 mm pain scale to airThe sensitive tooth if it was linked to a gum abscess, loose beyond grade 1, or pain from gum problems or bite trauma; if it had been restored in the previous 3 months; or if it supported a bridge or denture. People who had used desensitising products in the previous 3 months, took pain-altering medicines, or were pregnant or breastfeedingNot namedNot named5, full text of the randomised trial, participant recruitment; industry-funded
Double-blind randomised trial, 127 adults, China; authors employed by Lion Corporation, which made the pastes, or holding its research grants; 2026Potassium nitrate; potassium nitrate with aluminium lactate; a placebo pastePotassium nitrate: yes. Aluminium lactate: noAt least one sensitive tooth with receded gum at the neck, 10–50 g on the probe or 2 or more on the air scoreSevere dental, gum or mouth-lining disease; advanced gum disease or gum treatment in the past year; sensitive teeth loose to grade 1 or more; "teeth with extensive restorations, suspected chronic pulpitis, dental caries, enamel cracks", or supporting a removable denture; regular desensitising toothpaste use; pain-altering medicinesYesYes (enamel cracks)6, full text of the randomised trial, exclusion criteria; industry-funded
Examiner-blind randomised trial, 76 adults, Ireland; funded by GSK, with its employee as first author; 2017Calcium sodium phosphosilicate (bioactive glass), used continuously or in two spellsNoAt least 20 natural teeth, with four non-adjacent incisors, canines or premolars showing wear or receded gum and reacting to air; then two scoring 2 or more on air and 20 g or less on the probePeople with active decay or gum disease, restorations in poor repair or recent gum treatment. Test teeth with decay in the previous 12 months; exposed dentine with deep, defective or cheek-side fillings; crowns or veneers; bridge supports; orthodontic bands; "cracked enamel"; or sensitivity from any cause other than wear or receded gum, or judged unlikely to respond to an over-the-counter toothpasteYesYes (cracked enamel)16, full text of the randomised trial, materials and methods; industry-funded
Consensus guidelines for dentine hypersensitivity trials, committee from academia and industry, 1997Not applicableNot applicableA clinical diagnosis of dentine hypersensitivity; several sites may be scored in one person; cheek-facing surfaces of incisors, canines and premolars preferred"Those with conflicting characteristics such as currently-active medical or dental therapy"Not in the abstractNot in the abstract1, abstract only
What a diagnosis of sensitivity is meant to rule out: 2013 overview of diagnostic criteriaNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableCracked tooth syndrome, fractured restorations, chipped teeth, dental and root caries, sensitivity after treatment, leaking restorations, pulpitis, gum inflammation, bleaching, atypical tooth painYesYes2, full text

Read across the rows and three things stand out. All four trials enrolled teeth that an examiner had provoked with air or a probe, and three of them tied that to exposed dentine at the neck of the tooth, receded gum or wear45616; each of the four was funded by, or written with, the manufacturer of a paste it tested. Two of the four named decay and enamel cracks among the teeth they turned away; one excluded "teeth with pathology likely to cause pain" without saying what that covered; and one excluded recently filled teeth, teeth with gum or bite-related pain and bridge or denture supports, without naming decay or cracks. And two would not have taken a person with a single sensitive tooth at all: one needed two qualifying teeth, the other four at screening and two at the start, in trials funded by Procter & Gamble and by GSK416.

The authors of the Procter & Gamble trial, seven of them employees of the company that makes one of the pastes they tested, set out the logic in their own introduction: dental professionals often attribute pain to dentine hypersensitivity "once other sources (e.g., dental caries, cracked-tooth syndrome, defective restorations) are excluded"4.

S3's actives sit inside this evidence, not outside it: potassium nitrate was one of the actives in two of these trials and nano-hydroxyapatite in one, and none of them tested S3. Whatever is known from them about potassium nitrate or hydroxyapatite was learned on teeth that had been looked at first.

Nobody appears to have published this as a table. A PubMed search for reviews and guidelines on exclusion criteria in this field, run for this page in September 2026, returned sixty-three records, and not one of them sets out which teeth were turned away. The page on how desensitising toothpastes are tested explains the air and probe scores in the table.

Can you tell from the pain whether it is "just sensitivity"?

No, and the research suggests that a dentist listening to a description cannot either; that is what the examination is for.

Start with the test that sounds most reliable, how the tooth reacts. When a 2012 systematic review asked how well toothache, or an abnormal reaction to heat or cold, reveals the condition of the nerve inside a tooth, not one of its 18 included studies reached high quality, and it called the evidence insufficient7. That does not make the signs worthless. It means nobody has shown how far they can be trusted.

Descriptions fare no better. The 2013 overview of diagnostic criteria notes that people describe their history, symptoms and discomfort so differently that the account alone does not allow a reliable and valid diagnosis, and that dentists often find it hard to tell dentine hypersensitivity from other painful conditions2. A second 2013 overview, on diagnosis in the dental office, concluded from the limited published data that dentists are not routinely examining for sensitivity or ruling out other causes of dental pain before managing it, and may be relying on what patients tell them17. Even a validated questionnaire does not split the two: a pain questionnaire of 16 items, developed and validated in a clinical study in London for patients to fill in themselves, scores reversible pulpitis, a nerve that is inflamed but can still settle, in the same group as sensitive dentine3. Questionnaires for the nerve itself are getting better. In a 2025 clinical study validating an 11-item pulp-pain questionnaire, the questionnaire told reversible from irreversible pulpitis apart with high accuracy in 300 adults who had come to a clinic with symptoms of pulpitis, checked against a dentist's history, examination, X-rays and pulp tests18. It was built for people already in the dental chair, and its abstract says nothing about sensitive dentine, so it does not turn one sore tooth into something to judge at home.

The trigger is no guide either. Cold was the main complaint among the London trial recruits described above12, and it is also what cracked teeth most often complain of: among 2,858 back teeth with a visible crack, enrolled by 209 dental practitioners in the United States in a practice-based study, 37% hurt with cold, against 16% that hurt on biting and 11% that hurt out of nowhere8. It started from teeth known to have a crack, so it gives no odds for a cold-sensitive tooth. What it removes is "it only hurts with cold" as a reason to relax.

The Oral Health Foundation's toothache page gives three possible causes for a sharp pain with cold: receding gums, a lost or worn filling, and a cracked or broken tooth19. Of the three, receding gums alone leave the kind of exposed dentine a sensitivity toothpaste was tested on.

What each of the others feels like, and what a dentist looks for, has its own page: a cracked tooth or a sensitive tooth, sensitivity or a cavity, sharp and brief or dull and lingering pain and pain that lingers after the trigger has gone. Hot and cold together is a pattern with a page of its own.

Can you keep using S3, or any sensitivity toothpaste, while you wait to see a dentist?

Yes. Brush your whole mouth as normal, morning and night, spit out, and keep the appointment where it is.

S3 is designed as a complete daily toothpaste that is safe for twice-daily use, and like every sensitivity toothpaste it cannot tell you what is wrong with one tooth. The trials behind its actives, funded by the manufacturers of the pastes they tested, were run on teeth an examiner had already picked out as sensitivity, with recently filled teeth, and in one of them decay and enamel cracks, ruled out first; none of them was run on a tooth nobody had looked at456.

The wait is the problem, not the paste. S3's own wording is that it is judged at two to four weeks. For a mouth of ordinary sensitivity that a dentist has already seen, that is a fair window. For one tooth that started hurting last week it is the wrong wait, because a paste's timetable is no reason to leave a possible crack or cavity unexamined.

Could a sensitivity toothpaste dull the twinge enough to hide what is behind it? Nobody has measured that, and the questions at the end of this page say what was searched. The risk this page can name is the delay.

For the sore tooth itself, the NHS suggestions while you wait for an appointment are practical ones10. Take painkillers such as ibuprofen or paracetamol, with a pharmacist's advice if you are unsure, and no aspirin for anyone under 1610. Eat soft foods and chew on the other side. Use a soft toothbrush and avoid flossing around the sore tooth, and skip anything sweet, very hot or very cold.

How soon should you be seen, and what should you say?

Book an ordinary appointment now, before any toothpaste trial, and go sooner if a sign in the table applies. Every row below comes from the NHS and Oral Health Foundation pages as they read on the day this page was written91910.

SignWhat the guidance says to doSourceThe page that explains it
Only one tooth is affectedSee a dentist; it could be a sign of tooth decay, a cracked tooth, gum problems or infectionOral Health Foundation, sensitive teeth9One tooth suddenly sensitive
The pain came on suddenlySee a dentist, for the same reasonsOral Health Foundation, sensitive teeth9One tooth suddenly sensitive
The pain is severe, or sensitivity has lasted more than a few weeksSee a dentistOral Health Foundation, sensitive teeth9How long to try a sensitivity toothpaste before seeing a dentist
Toothache for more than 2 days, or toothache that painkillers do not shiftSee a dentist, not a GPNHS, toothache10How long to try a sensitivity toothpaste before seeing a dentist
Pain when you bite downNHS: see a dentist. Oral Health Foundation: can be a sign of a cracked tooth, decay or a loose filling, and should always be checkedNHS, toothache10; Oral Health Foundation, toothache19A cracked tooth or a sensitive tooth
Sharp pain with coldMay be receding gums, a lost or worn filling, or a cracked or broken tooth; make an appointment if there is no improvement after two weeks. For a single tooth, do not wait the two weeks: the first row appliesOral Health Foundation, toothache19Sharp and brief or dull and lingering
A dull ache that comes and goes, or needs painkillersThe nerve inside the tooth may be irritated, damaged or dying; see a dentist for further checksOral Health Foundation, toothache19Sensitivity that lingers after the trigger has gone
Toothache with a high temperature, red gums or a bad taste, or with a swollen cheek or jawSee a dentistNHS, toothache10Sensitivity with swelling or a bad taste
Severe pain that keeps you awake, is throbbing or constant, does not improve with painkillers, or comes with swellingMay be an infection or abscess; contact a dentist urgentlyOral Health Foundation, toothache19Tooth pain at night
Swelling around the eye or in the neck, or swelling that makes it hard to breathe, swallow or speakGo to A&E, and do not drive yourself thereNHS, toothache10Sensitivity with swelling or a bad taste

The category's biggest brand says much the same about its own tubes. Sensodyne's UK FAQ tells people whose pain or sensitivity still persists to see a dentist, "as your sensitive teeth may indicate a different problem", and gives "a cracked tooth or a cavity (tooth decay)" as examples of tooth pain that is not sensitivity.

This page compares ingredients and stated actions only, not clinical performance, based on what each brand states about its own formula. Prices and formulations may change; always check the pack.

What does waiting risk? Nobody appears to have measured it for a tooth that has turned sensitive, and this page will not invent a figure. The nearest evidence is for cracked teeth that were found. In a retrospective cohort clinical study of 199 cracked teeth in Singapore whose nerve was judged able to recover, 71% were still healthy three years later and 29.1% went on to an irreversibly inflamed or dead nerve, more often in teeth that never received a crown20. Every one of those teeth had already been examined, fitted with a protective band on the day and sent on for treatment. A tooth gets that only once someone has looked at it, which is the point of the appointment.

Take one sentence with you, in your own words: which tooth, for how long, what sets it off, whether the pain stops when the trigger stops, whether biting hurts, and what you have been brushing with. Something like: "One tooth at the back on the upper right has hurt with cold drinks for about ten days, the twinge goes within a few seconds, it does not hurt to bite, and I started a sensitivity toothpaste last week." The page on what a dentist checks for sensitive teeth walks through the examination that follows. If the sensitivity has arrived across several teeth at once rather than in one, the Journal's article why are my teeth suddenly sensitive is the better place to start.

Frequently asked questions

Will S3 fix one sensitive tooth?

If a dentist examines the tooth and finds exposed dentine and nothing else, a sensitivity toothpaste may help it over a few weeks like any other, and S3 is made for exactly that kind of everyday use, twice a day across the whole mouth. What no trial can tell you in advance is whether your tooth is that kind, because the trials left out the teeth where something else was going on1. The examination can. If it finds a crack, decay or a failing filling, the dentist's treatment comes first.

Is it normal for one tooth to be sensitive after a filling?

It is common enough to have been counted, and worth reporting if it lasts or grows. In a practice-based cohort clinical study of 665 fillings for decay in 602 patients in the United States, 18% of the 491 teeth reported on four weeks later had appreciable sensitivity; the filling had removed the sensitivity in 63% of the teeth that had it beforehand, and new sensitivity appeared in 10% of teeth that had none21. The Journal's guide to tooth sensitivity after a filling covers what usually settles, and a filled tooth that hurts on biting goes back to the dentist who placed the filling.

Can a sensitivity toothpaste hide a problem?

Nobody has measured whether it does. A PubMed search run for this page in September 2026, pairing desensitising toothpastes with masking, delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, returned two records, and neither studied it. The risk this page can point to is the waiting: weeks spent giving a paste its chance are weeks in which a crack or decay is not being looked at, whatever the paste does to the twinge.

Should I use a sensitivity toothpaste differently on the sore tooth?

No. Brush the whole mouth as usual, twice a day, and spit out. The trials in the table, each funded by or written with the manufacturer of a paste it tested, used their pastes as ordinary toothpastes for brushing45616. Nothing on this page supports treating one tooth in a different way; the appointment is what that tooth needs.

What will a dentist do about one sensitive tooth?

Find out which tooth it is and why before choosing anything. If it turns out to have exposed dentine and nothing more, the Oral Health Foundation says a dentist may put a desensitising treatment on it, suggest a high-fluoride toothpaste, cover a worn patch near the gum with a filling, or treat gum disease9. The page on dental treatments for sensitivity goes through those options and how long each lasts.

S3 Sensitivity Science™ pairs potassium nitrate with two hydroxyapatites and adult-strength fluoride in one daily paste.

See the toothpaste

One tube, three actives: potassium nitrate for the nerve, nano-hydroxyapatite inside the tubule, biomimetic hydroxyapatite on the surface, with 1450 ppm fluoride kept in. Calm, strengthen, protect: the three actions sensitive teeth need, in one daily toothpaste. The formula is patent-pending S3 Repair Technology™, UK application GB2604755.5. S3 is built with, and owned by, UK dentists: more than 20 practitioners are investors in it, not endorsers. Read more about S3.

References 21 sources

1
Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 24(11):808-813. 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x Consensus guideline (expert committee report); n: not applicable.
2
Gernhardt CR. How valid and applicable are current diagnostic criteria and assessment methods for dentin hypersensitivity? An overview. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17 Suppl 1:S31-S40. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0891-1 Narrative review (overview with a literature search); full text read.
3
Pau A, Croucher R, Marcenes W, Leung T. Development and validation of a dental pain-screening questionnaire. Pain, 119(1-3):75-81. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.016 Questionnaire development and diagnostic validation clinical study; n: not stated in the abstract.
4
Biesbrock AR, He T, Zou Y, Grender JM, Amini P, Sagel PA, Groth A, Klukowska M. Randomized clinical trial evaluating kinetic benefits of desensitizing agents: magnitude, onset, and stability of relief. Journal of Periodontology. 2025. doi:10.1002/JPER.24-0688 Double-blind RCT; n: 120 randomised, 118 completed; industry-funded (Procter & Gamble); full text read.
5
Amaechi BT, Lemke KC, Saha S, Luong MN, Gelfond J. Clinical efficacy of nanohydroxyapatite-containing toothpaste at relieving dentin hypersensitivity: an 8 weeks randomized control trial. BDJ Open. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41405-021-00080-7 Double-blind RCT; n: 105 recruited, 85 completed; industry-funded (Sangi); full text read.
6
Ishii K, Suzuki T, Akabane C, Iizumi G, Suzuki N, Fukuda Y, et al. Toothpastes containing potassium nitrate alone versus potassium nitrate combined with aluminum lactate in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial. BDJ Open, 12(1). 2026. doi:10.1038/s41405-026-00452-x Double-blind RCT (three arms, placebo-controlled); n: 127; industry-funded (Lion Corporation); full text read.
7
Mejàre IA, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T, et al. Diagnosis of the condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal, 45(7):597-613. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02016.x Systematic review (diagnostic accuracy, QUADAS and GRADE); n: 18 studies.
8
Hilton TJ, Funkhouser E, Ferracane JL, Gordan VV, Huff KD, Barna J, et al. Associations of types of pain with crack-level, tooth-level and patient-level characteristics in posterior teeth with visible cracks: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Journal of Dentistry, 70:67-73. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.014 Cross-sectional practice-based observational clinical study; n: 2,858 cracked teeth.
9
Oral Health Foundation. Sensitive teeth. https://www.dentalhealth.org/sensitive-teeth Accessed 2026-09-10.
10
NHS. Toothache. https://www.nhs.uk/symptoms/toothache/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
11
Pollard AJ, Pollard TJ, Glenny AM, Clarkson J, Walsh T, Davies M, et al. Definition and recommendations for trial methods for evaluating dentin hypersensitivity: A hybrid AI-assisted scoping review and Delphi consensus process. Periodontology 2000. 2026. doi:10.1111/prd.70079 Scoping review + Delphi consensus; n: 72 papers on definitions, 58 randomised trials appraised.
12
Gillam DG, Aris A, Bulman JS, Newman HN, Ley F. Dentine hypersensitivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials: clinical evaluation, prevalence and intra-oral distribution. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 29(3):226-231. 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00813.x Cross-sectional clinical screening study of trial volunteers; n: 117 examined, 3,136 teeth; an erratum was published in 2003.
13
Ye W, Feng XP, Li R. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in Chinese adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 39(3):182-187. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02248.x Cross-sectional population-based clinical study (multi-stage stratified random sample); n: 2,120 adults.
14
Costa RS, Rios FS, Moura MS, Jardim JJ, Maltz M, Haas AN. Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult and elderly populations from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Journal of Periodontology, 85(9):1247-1258. 2014. doi:10.1902/jop.2014.130728 Cross-sectional population-based clinical study (probability sample, home examination); n: 1,023 adults.
15
Yoshizaki KT, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Sobral MA, Aranha AC, Mendes FM, Scaramucci T. Clinical features and factors associated with non-carious cervical lesions and dentin hypersensitivity. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 44(2):112-118. 2017. doi:10.1111/joor.12469 Cross-sectional clinical study; n: 118 patients, 2,902 teeth.
16
Mason S, Kingston R, Shneyer L, Harding M. Clinical study to monitor dentinal hypersensitivity with episodic use of a desensitising dentifrice. BDJ Open. 2017. doi:10.1038/bdjopen.2017.11 RCT (examiner-blind, exploratory, parallel-group); n: 76; industry-funded (GSK Consumer Healthcare); full text read.
17
Gillam DG. Current diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office: an overview. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17 Suppl 1:S21-S29. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0911-1 Narrative review (overview with a PubMed literature search); full text read.
18
Kumar V, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Kalaivani M, Baidya DK, et al. Novel pain assessment tool specific for pulp symptoms to aid diagnosis. International Endodontic Journal, 58(4):566-578. 2025. doi:10.1111/iej.14195 Questionnaire development and diagnostic validation clinical study; n: 80 in the pilot, 300 adult patients in the validation.
19
Oral Health Foundation. Toothache. https://www.dentalhealth.org/toothache Accessed 2026-09-10.
20
Wu S, Lew HP, Chen NN. Incidence of Pulpal Complications after Diagnosis of Vital Cracked Teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 45(5):521-525. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.003 Retrospective cohort clinical study; n: 199 cracked teeth in 184 patients.
21
Berkowitz G, Spielman H, Matthews A, Vena D, Craig R, Curro F, Thompson V. Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 34(3):e44-e52. 2013. PMID 23631638. Prospective practice-based cohort clinical study; n: 665 restorations in 602 patients, 491 reported at 4 weeks; full text read.