The toothpaste
Question

Sensitivity that lingers after the trigger has gone: what pulpal pain means.

Sensitivity that lingers after the cold or hot drink has gone is usually pulpal pain: it comes from the pulp, the soft core of nerve and blood vessels inside the tooth, rather than from exposed dentine on the surface. It needs a dentist to find out whether the pulp can recover and what will keep the tooth, and the Oral Health Foundation says as much, describing a dull, lingering ache as a possible sign that the nerve inside is irritated, damaged or dying, and telling anyone with one to see a dentist for further checks1. S3 Sensitivity Science™ was formulated for the two things wrong in dentine sensitivity, a nerve that fires too readily and dentine tubules that are open to the mouth; an inflamed pulp is a different problem, inside the tooth. No toothpaste is a treatment for that tissue or has been tested as one, and what follows is what has been measured instead.

What was checked19 peer-reviewed studies and reviews, the NHS and the Oral Health Foundation

Key points
  • What separates an inflamed pulp from sensitive dentine is how long the pain goes on, and the seconds that mark the stages were timed by clinicians with a cold stimulus on one isolated tooth, so this page gives no rule for timing a drink at home.
  • The labels dentists work with, reversible and irreversible pulpitis, matched the microscope in most extracted teeth from one practice, disagreed more often in a second study that split the irreversible label, and are being argued over by the people who write the guidelines234.
  • Keeping the nerve alive is often possible: a 2025 systematic review found that partial or full pulpotomy succeeded in 90% of adult teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, a pooled figure that includes young people's teeth, and an earlier review of the same treatment judged its studies at high risk of bias56.
  • Antibiotics are not a treatment for this pain: the Cochrane review found a single trial of 40 people, in which pain ran the same course with penicillin as with a placebo, and rated that evidence as low certainty7.
  • S3 is built for the surface half of the problem, open tubules and a nerve too ready to fire, and no trial has tested it, or any other toothpaste, as a treatment for an inflamed pulp.

Why does a lingering ache point to the pulp rather than the surface?

Because the pain of sensitive dentine belongs to its trigger, and a pain that carries on without one is usually coming from somewhere else. Dentine is the layer beneath the enamel and the gum line, threaded with microscopic fluid-filled channels called tubules. When their outer ends are open to the mouth, a cold drink or a breath of air shifts the fluid inside them and the nerve endings at the inner end respond. Pain of that kind is short and sharp, arrives with the stimulus, and is called sensitivity only once the other things that can go wrong with a tooth have been ruled out; a 2019 clinical review written for UK primary dental care explains why that ruling-out matters, since the symptoms people report can have several different causes8. Pain that goes on after the stimulus has stopped does not fit that description.

The pulp is the living tissue at the centre of the tooth, and pulpitis simply means that it is inflamed. Decay that has crept close to it, a crack or an injury can all reach it, routes that both the NHS and the Oral Health Foundation list910. Dental work can do it too: the same review notes that a new filling changes the layers of a tooth quickly, and that the pulp can answer with inflammation and a tooth that reacts more to temperature8.

The difference in timing has been put on a stopwatch. In a clinical study of 60 adults, clinicians held a cold stimulus to each diagnosed tooth and counted how long the response lasted: in teeth judged able to recover it faded after roughly four or five seconds, in teeth judged beyond recovery it ran to six seconds or longer, and the longer responses went with more of an inflammatory enzyme in the dentine11. Those seconds belong to a dried, isolated tooth and a timed clinical stimulus, which is nothing like a mouthful of tea. A PubMed search run for this page in September 2026, read alongside an earlier search for this group of pages, looked for a duration a person could time at home with a drink and turned up nothing usable, so the page does not offer one. The page on teeth sensitive to hot and cold at the same time sets the timings beside the patterns of cracks and decay.

One delayed pattern is different again. A dull ache that begins a quarter of an hour after coming indoors from the cold, with no pain from drinks at all, has been described in three patients in a hypothesis paper, and the page on sensitive teeth in winter covers it12.

What do "reversible" and "irreversible" pulpitis mean, and how firm are those labels?

They are working labels for a prediction. Reversible pulpitis is the name for a pulp that is inflamed but expected to settle once whatever is irritating it has been dealt with. Irreversible pulpitis is the name for a pulp that is not expected to settle, and the customary way of relieving it has been to remove the inflamed pulp and clean out the root canal, or to take the tooth out7. Symptomatic means it hurts: a 2025 review defined symptomatic irreversible pulpitis by pain that comes on by itself, pain that lingers after heat or cold, or pain felt somewhere other than the tooth responsible5. Pulp necrosis means the pulp has died.

In the chair, the line is drawn from the history and a handful of tests. One clinical study of cracked teeth, for example, counted a pulp as reversibly inflamed when there had been no pain out of the blue, the response to cold did not linger, and nothing showed at the root tip13.

How often does the label match the tissue? The answer most often quoted comes from a clinical study in one general dental practice in Italy, where 95 teeth that had been given a clinical pulp diagnosis were later extracted for unrelated reasons over five years and examined under the microscope2. In that clinical study, a label of healthy or reversibly inflamed pulp matched the tissue in 57 of 59 teeth, and a label of irreversible pulpitis matched in 27 of 32 teeth; bacteria advancing into the pulp were a common finding in the irreversibly inflamed teeth and were absent from the rest2.

A second clinical study, open access and from a university clinic in Romania, asked a narrower question and got a less tidy answer. Every tooth in it had already been labelled irreversible, and the clinicians also judged whether the inflammation was acute or long-standing. Across 51 pulps removed during treatment in that clinical study, the judgement matched the microscope in 35 and missed in 16, most often because a pulp called acute in the chair looked chronically inflamed on the slide3. The authors describe the correlation as weak and ask for the classification of pulp disease to be simplified3. The two studies are testing different lines, the first between recoverable and not, the second inside the irreversible label, so their percentages should not be set against each other23.

Both describe teeth that were already out of the mouth or already being treated, from one practice and one clinic, not a random sample of aching teeth. The direction is still clear enough to state plainly. Even the labels a dentist uses do not always match what the tissue shows, so this page does not tell you which stage your tooth is at.

The table sets the working labels side by side. It is a map for the conversation at the surgery, not a way to label your own tooth, and no toothpaste has a row in it because none belongs there.

LabelWhat it tends to feel likeWhat a dentist may findUsual treatment, and NHS band in England (as shown on nhs.uk, 10 September 2026)How firm the label isSource
Dentine sensitivity, for contrastA short, sharp twinge with cold, air, touch or sweet things, gone within moments of the triggerExposed dentine and no other cause for the painA desensitising toothpaste, judged over weeks; an examination is Band 1, £27.90A diagnosis reached by ruling the other causes out14815
Reversible pulpitisPain with a stimulus that does not linger, and no pain out of the blueA response to cold that fades; a cause such as decay, a crack or recent dental workDealing with the cause; for deep decay, a filling, sometimes with a protective layer or cap over the pulp; fillings are Band 2, £76.60In one practice the label matched the microscope in 57 of 59 extracted teeth1385152
Symptomatic irreversible pulpitisPain that starts by itself, lingers after heat or cold, or is felt somewhere elseA lingering response to testing; healthy neighbouring teeth may over-respond as wellPartial or full pulpotomy, root canal treatment, or extraction; Band 2, £76.60Matched in 27 of 32 in the same practice; the finer acute or chronic split matched in 35 of 51 at a university clinic51691523
Pulp necrosis, or an abscessThrobbing or constant pain that painkillers do not settle, sometimes waking you; swelling points to infectionA pulp that no longer responds to testing; pus to drain if there is an abscessRoot canal treatment with drainage of any abscess, or extraction; Band 2, £76.60Pulp tests show whether a pulp is alive, and even the most accurate thermal test misclassifies some teeth117915
A cracked tooth with an irritated pulpSharp pain on biting, or with coldA crack, and a pulp that may still be recoverableA band and a full-coverage crown in the study behind this row; crowns are Band 3, £332.1029.1% of 199 cracked teeth judged recoverable progressed within three years11315

Are the labels changing?

Yes, slowly, and it is a live argument rather than a settled change. In 2017 eight endodontists from the Netherlands, Ireland and the UK proposed, in an editorial in the International Endodontic Journal, a new system for grading pulpitis tied to the treatment each grade needs18. Their system sorts pulpitis into four grades, initial, mild, moderate and severe, so that a dentist can match a grade to a treatment that keeps as much of the pulp alive as possible19.

The first test of the grading, an exploratory clinical study published in 2026, found it consistent between examiners but hard to confirm under the microscope: two examiners grading 140 patients agreed almost perfectly, but the grade given in the chair agreed only poorly to fairly with a pathologist's reading of 52 extracted teeth, and the authors conclude that its validity against the tissue appears limited19. A 2026 narrative review by some of the same proposers goes further, arguing that pulp disease should be described as a continuum rather than split into reversible and irreversible, while accepting that no reliable chairside test of how inflamed a pulp is exists yet4. The European Society of Endodontology's first fully evidence-graded clinical practice guideline, published in 2023 and built from 14 commissioned systematic reviews and a structured consensus, covers diagnosis and the management of deep decay in teeth with and without spontaneous pain, and names preventing tooth loss as its aim20. This page could not read the guideline's individual recommendations, because its full text would not load when the page was written, so it does not quote them.

Two things follow for a reader. The words in your dental notes may differ from the words on this page, and a change of words is not a change in your tooth. And the case for new words is being made mainly by one group of European endodontists, two of whom also led or co-wrote the guideline, which is worth knowing without being a reason to doubt them.

What will a dentist do, and can the nerve be kept alive?

A dentist may start with the story: when the pain began, what sets it off, how long it lasts, whether it comes on by itself or wakes you, and whether biting hurts. Tests on the suspect tooth and its neighbours may follow, often a cold stimulus, sometimes heat or a small electric current, a gentle tap, and an X-ray. The neighbours matter because an inflamed pulp can make the healthy teeth around it overreact: in a clinical study of 64 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, the adjacent tooth and the matching tooth in the opposite jaw responded more strongly to cold until the inflamed tooth had been treated16. No single test settles it. Pooled across 28 studies in a meta-analysis, the cold test's adjusted accuracy was 0.84 and the heat test's 0.7217. The page on what a dentist checks for sensitive teeth walks through the visit.

If the pulp is inflamed, the options run from keeping all of it to removing the tooth. In pulp capping, the dentist clears the decay and covers the pulp, or the thin dentine left over it, with a protective material. In a partial pulpotomy, a small part of the inflamed pulp is removed where it was exposed; in a full pulpotomy, the pulp in the crown of the tooth is removed and the pulp in the roots is left alive. Root canal treatment removes all of the pulp, cleans the canals and fills them. Extraction takes the tooth out.

The NHS describes root canal treatment as removing an infection from inside the tooth, done under local anaesthetic over two or more appointments that may each last one to two hours, with a crown sometimes needed afterwards if the tooth was badly infected9. It also says that an infected tooth left without that treatment may have to come out9. Once root canal treatment is done, the tooth no longer has a living nerve, and the Oral Health Foundation notes that it can become more brittle and more likely to break, which is why a crown is sometimes recommended10.

That is part of why dentistry has been moving towards keeping the pulp alive, and the pooled figures are encouraging. A 2025 systematic review with meta-analyses found that in adult teeth diagnosed with a healthy or reversibly inflamed pulp, capping and pulpotomy techniques each succeeded in 91% to 97% of teeth at 24 months, with no significant difference between them5. In teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, the label that has traditionally meant a more invasive approach, partial or full pulpotomy succeeded in 90% in the same review, against 97% in teeth with a healthy or reversible pulp, a gap that fell just short of statistical significance56.

Two limits sit beside those numbers. The review pooled adult teeth, including those of young people, and the only five-year figure it gives for full pulpotomy in painful irreversibly inflamed teeth, 78%, comes from a single study5. An earlier systematic review of pulpotomy in fully formed teeth with signs of irreversible pulpitis, by authors in Belfast, Dublin and Birmingham, reported clinical success of 97.4% at a year falling to 93.97% at three years, and warned in the same breath that its eight studies were heterogeneous and at high risk of bias, and that properly powered randomised trials are needed before practice should change6.

The closest thing to a head-to-head answer is a randomised controlled trial from Jordan. In that randomised trial, 60 molars with decay reaching the pulp and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis were given either a full pulpotomy or root canal treatment, and at a year each approach had succeeded in 27 of 29 teeth, with less pain on the first day and fewer people needing painkillers after pulpotomy21. A year is not a lifetime and one university centre is not an NHS practice, so none of this promises that your pulp can be kept. What it does show is that a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis no longer makes root canal treatment the only thing worth discussing, and that asking about the alternatives at the appointment is reasonable.

When a crack is behind the pain, the clock runs differently. In a retrospective clinical study in Singapore of 199 cracked teeth whose pulps were judged recoverable, every tooth was banded and referred for a crown, and within three years 29.1% had moved on to irreversible pulpitis or a dead pulp; teeth that never received a full-coverage crown were far more likely to be among them13. The page on one tooth that has suddenly become sensitive describes how a crack tends to show itself.

On the NHS in England, as shown on nhs.uk on the tenth of September 2026, root canal treatment falls in Band 2, which the charges page describes as treatment for an infection or inflammation in the centre of the tooth, at £76.60, and a crown falls in Band 3, at £332.1015. Those charges may change, some groups are exempt, and the other UK nations run their own systems; the page on free and low-cost NHS dental options explains who pays what.

Is there anything a toothpaste like S3 can do for a lingering ache?

Not for the pulp. A desensitising toothpaste works where ordinary sensitivity starts, at the exposed surface, by quietening the nerve endings at the inner ends of open tubules or by narrowing the tubules themselves, and it does that over weeks of brushing. S3 was formulated for exactly those two surface problems. An inflamed pulp is a different problem in a different place.

This page went looking for evidence that a paste can treat it. The searches were run on PubMed in September 2026. One paired pulpitis with toothpaste, dentifrice, potassium nitrate or desensitising and with treatment or trial, and returned ten records; a second, widened to other potassium salts and to toothache, added nothing new. Neither turned up a single trial of a toothpaste brushed at home as a treatment for an inflamed pulp. The nearest records were a handful of reports from 1983 to 2005 in which potassium nitrate was mixed into a cement that a dentist placed inside the cavity during a filling; that is a dental procedure inside the tooth, the reports are decades old, and they say nothing about a paste.

Even for ordinary sensitivity, the route from a paste to the nerve is argued over. A 1996 review in the journal Pain pointed out that fluid moving outward through the tubules works against potassium moving in, and proposed another explanation for how potassium might still act22. In a laboratory study of 50 extracted molars, potassium nitrate from a toothpaste reached the pulp chamber within 30 minutes in amounts that varied with the formulation, but an extracted tooth has none of the outward fluid flow of a living one23. Neither paper is a reason to think a potassium paste could treat an inflamed pulp, and this page does not suggest it.

Nothing on this page is a reason to buy a toothpaste: in the published evidence, the only thing that treats an inflamed pulp is a dentist's procedure, and what the NHS suggests while you wait is a painkiller, not a paste24. The nerve-calming ingredient in S3 is aimed at the surface half of sensitivity; it is not a treatment for an inflamed pulp, and no trial has tested it as one.

If you already use a sensitivity toothpaste, keep brushing gently as usual, but do not read a quieter week as the pulp settling. A paste acts on the surface twinge, and the ache from inside is what the dentist needs to hear about.

What helps while you wait, and what does not?

A painkiller, the right door and not much else. The NHS says to see a dentist for toothache that lasts more than two days, and sooner when painkillers do not shift it, when it comes with a temperature, pain on biting, red gums or a bad taste, or when a cheek or the jaw swells; it adds that a GP will not be able to give dental treatment24. For the wait itself its advice is ibuprofen or paracetamol, with a pharmacist's help if you are unsure and no aspirin for anyone under 16, soft food, and keeping away from anything sweet, very hot or very cold24. This page gives no doses and no combinations; the guide to what helps tooth nerve pain tonight goes through the evidence on painkillers.

Antibiotics are the remedy many people expect, and the trial evidence gives no sign that they help this pain7. The Cochrane review of antibiotics for irreversible pulpitis, updated in 2019, still rests on a single trial of 40 people in which one group took penicillin and the other a placebo, both alongside painkillers; pain ratings ran almost in parallel for seven days, and the two groups took almost the same number of ibuprofen tablets, 9.20 against 9.607. The reviewers rated that evidence as low certainty and concluded that there is not enough of it to say whether antibiotics ease the pain at all7.

Swelling, a fever or a foul taste change the picture, because they point to infection, and whether an antibiotic is then needed is for the dentist or doctor who examines you. The page on sensitivity with swelling or a bad taste sets out those signs and where to go, and the page on tooth pain at night covers pain that wakes you. For the short, ordinary twinge this page keeps contrasting with the pulp, the Journal explains why cold hurts your teeth and why teeth can turn sensitive suddenly.

Frequently asked questions

Will S3 calm a tooth that aches after a hot drink?

Not if the ache stays once the drink has gone. S3 is designed for what goes wrong at the surface in dentine sensitivity, the open tubules and the over-ready nerve, whereas an ache that outlasts the heat is coming from the pulp inside the tooth, where no toothpaste has been tested. The page on hot drinks and coffee explains why heat behaves differently from cold, and the page on teeth sensitive to hot and cold at the same time lays out the timing patterns. What helps this tooth is a dental appointment.

Is there a desensitising toothpaste for immediate nerve pain relief?

Not for the pain of an inflamed pulp, on the first evening or later. Desensitising pastes are tested on exposed dentine over weeks of twice-daily brushing, with most trials running for eight weeks under the consensus guidelines for that research14, and the searches for this page found none tested on pulpitis. For pain now, the NHS points to ibuprofen or paracetamol as a pharmacist advises, and to a dentist if the toothache goes on beyond two days24.

Does lingering pain mean I need a root canal?

Not necessarily, and only a dentist who has examined the tooth can say. Root canal treatment is one option; others keep part of the pulp alive, and in a randomised controlled trial of 60 molars with irreversible pulpitis, full pulpotomy matched root canal treatment at one year, with less pain on the first day21. Which option fits depends on the tooth, the cause and what the dentist finds, and the European guideline on these treatments puts preventing tooth loss at its centre20.

Can an irritated nerve recover on its own?

Reversible means the pulp is expected to settle, but usually once its cause has been dealt with, and the cause, whether decay near the pulp, a crack or recent dental work, is normally something a dentist has to treat. Even with treatment under way, a crack can go on irritating the pulp: in the Singapore clinical study of cracked teeth, 29.1% of pulps judged recoverable progressed within three years although every tooth had been banded and referred for a crown13. A pain that fades is not proof either way, and a dentist's check is what tells the difference.

Can antibiotics settle an inflamed nerve?

The trial evidence gives no sign that they do7. The 2019 Cochrane review found one small trial of 40 people in which penicillin did no better than a placebo for the pain of irreversible pulpitis, and it rated the evidence as low certainty7. Swelling, a fever or feeling unwell are a different matter because they point to infection, and then a dentist or doctor decides what is needed.

S3 Sensitivity Science™ pairs potassium nitrate with two hydroxyapatites and adult-strength fluoride in one daily paste.

See the toothpaste

S3 Sensitivity Science™ makes a daily toothpaste that joins potassium nitrate at 5% with two hydroxyapatites, nano-hydroxyapatite at 10% and biomimetic hydroxyapatite at 5%, both as solution, and fluoride at full adult strength. The formula is built around three actions: calming the nerve, strengthening the enamel surface and protecting against further wear. It carries the name S3 Repair Technology™ and is patent-pending under UK application GB2604755.5. Over 20 practising UK dentists are investors in S3, not endorsers of it. Read more about S3.

References 24 sources

1
Oral Health Foundation. Toothache. https://www.dentalhealth.org/toothache Accessed 2026-09-10.
2
Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF Jr. Correlation between clinical and histologic pulp diagnoses. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(12):1932-1939. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.010 Cross-sectional clinical study comparing clinical and histological diagnosis, 95 teeth from one general practice.
3
Giuroiu CL, Căruntu ID, Lozneanu L, Melian A, Vataman M, Andrian S. Dental pulp: correspondences and contradictions between clinical and histological diagnosis. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:960321. doi:10.1155/2015/960321 Cross-sectional clinical study comparing clinical and histological diagnosis, 51 pulpitis specimens from 59 patients; open access, full text read.
4
El Karim I, Duncan HF, About I, Dunne OM, Lundy FT. Refining pulpal diagnostics for predictable vital pulp treatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2026; online ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2026.08.022 Narrative review.
5
Coll JA, Dhar V, Guelmann M, Crystal YO, Chen CY, Marghalani AA, et al. Vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Pediatric Dentistry. 2025;47(3):137-150. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40533920/ Systematic review with meta-analyses.
6
Cushley S, Duncan HF, Lappin MJ, Tomson PL, Lundy FT, Cooper P, et al. Pulpotomy for mature carious teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review. Journal of Dentistry. 2019;88:103158. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.005 Systematic review, eight studies.
7
Agnihotry A, Thompson W, Fedorowicz Z, van Zuuren EJ, Sprakel J. Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;5(5):CD004969. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004969.pub5 Cochrane systematic review, one randomised trial, 40 participants.
8
Longridge NN, Youngson CC. Dental pain: dentine sensitivity, hypersensitivity and cracked tooth syndrome. Primary Dental Journal. 2019;8(1):44-51. doi:10.1177/205016841900800101 Clinical review for UK primary dental care.
9
NHS. Root canal treatment. https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/root-canal-treatment/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
10
Oral Health Foundation. Root canal treatment. https://www.dentalhealth.org/root-canal-treatment Accessed 2026-09-10.
11
Aguirre-López EC, Patiño-Marín N, Martínez-Castañón GA, Medina-Solís CE, Castillo-Silva BE, Cepeda-Argüelles O, et al. Levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8 and cold test in reversible and irreversible pulpitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(52):e23782. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000023782 Cross-sectional clinical study, 60 adults.
12
Le Fur-Bonnabesse A, Bodéré C, Hélou C, Chevalier V, Goulet JP. Dental pain induced by an ambient thermal differential: pathophysiological hypothesis. Journal of Pain Research. 2017;10:2845-2851. doi:10.2147/JPR.S142539 Hypothesis review with three case descriptions.
13
Wu S, Lew HP, Chen NN. Incidence of pulpal complications after diagnosis of vital cracked teeth. Journal of Endodontics. 2019;45(5):521-525. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.003 Retrospective clinical study, 199 cracked teeth in 184 patients.
14
Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1997;24(11):808-813. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x Consensus guideline, expert committee report.
15
NHS. How much NHS dental treatment costs. https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/dentists/how-much-nhs-dental-treatment-costs/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
16
Sooratgar A, Ahmadi Z, Asadi Y, Dibaji F, Shamshiri AR, Afkhami F. Evaluation of secondary thermal hyperalgesia resulting from pulpal inflammation in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Journal of Endodontics. 2021;47(6):902-905. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.010 Non-randomised clinical study, 64 patients, before and after treatment.
17
Mainkar A, Kim SG. Diagnostic accuracy of 5 dental pulp tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(5):694-702. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.021 Systematic review and meta-analysis, 28 studies.
18
Wolters WJ, Duncan HF, Tomson PL, Karim IE, McKenna G, Dorri M, et al. Minimally invasive endodontics: a new diagnostic system for assessing pulpitis and subsequent treatment needs. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50(9):825-829. doi:10.1111/iej.12793 Editorial; no abstract deposited, cited for the proposal and its date only.
19
Yılmaz ÇF, Barış E, Ilk O, Kayaoğlu G. Histopathologic validity and clinical reliability of Wolters classification of pulpitis: an exploratory study. International Endodontic Journal. 2026; online ahead of print. doi:10.1111/iej.70213 Exploratory cross-sectional clinical and histological study, 52 extracted teeth and 140 patients.
20
Duncan HF, Kirkevang LL, Peters OA, El-Karim I, Krastl G, Del Fabbro M, et al. Treatment of pulpal and apical disease: the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) S3-level clinical practice guideline. International Endodontic Journal. 2023;56 Suppl 3:238-295. doi:10.1111/iej.13974 Clinical practice guideline built on 14 systematic reviews; abstract read, full text not accessible.
21
Taha NA, Abuzaid AM, Khader YS. A randomized controlled clinical trial of pulpotomy versus root canal therapy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: outcome, quality of life, and patients' satisfaction. Journal of Endodontics. 2023;49(6):624-631.e2. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2023.04.001 Randomised controlled trial, 60 molars.
22
McCormack K, Davies R. The enigma of potassium ion in the management of dentine hypersensitivity: is nitric oxide the elusive second messenger? Pain. 1996;68(1):5-11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9251993/ Review and hypothesis paper.
23
Kwon SR, Dawson DV, Schenck DM, Fiegel J, Wertz PW. Spectrophotometric evaluation of potassium nitrate penetration into the pulp cavity. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40(6):614-621. doi:10.2341/14-214-L In vitro study, 50 extracted human molars.
24
NHS. Toothache. https://www.nhs.uk/symptoms/toothache/ Accessed 2026-09-10.