The toothpaste
Question

Can you use two sensitivity toothpastes together? What combining actives does and does not add.

You can use two sensitivity toothpastes together, but no published trial has tested it, and the version most people build — a potassium nitrate paste at one brushing and a hydroxyapatite paste at the other — gives each active one brushing a day instead of two. Because most hydroxyapatite toothpastes on the UK shelf carry no fluoride, that routine often gives up one of the day's two fluoride brushings as well. S3 Sensitivity Science™ is the only one of 51 UK sensitivity toothpastes in the September 2026 category review whose published ingredients put potassium nitrate, hydroxyapatite and a fluoride salt in the same tube. The nearest miss is Spotlight Sensitivity + Rebuilding Pro, which puts a potassium salt, hydroxyapatite and fluoride in one tube with potassium citrate in place of nitrate, based on what each brand states about its own formula.

What was checked17 peer-reviewed studies, guidance from the NHS, the UK government's oral health toolkit and the Oral Health Foundation, and product information as published by each brand

Key points
  • Nobody has published a trial in which one person used two desensitising toothpastes with different actives, together or on alternate brushings; three PubMed searches run for this page in September 2026 turned up paste-and-rinse regimens3, a laser with a paste7 and, in one industry-funded pilot, an in-office treatment followed by a home paste8, and no two-toothpaste routine.
  • Split across two tubes, each active gets one brushing a day, and 13 of the 16 other hydroxyapatite pastes recorded in the category review carry no fluoride, so pairing one of them with a potassium nitrate paste leaves one fluoride brushing where the NHS advises two.
  • In the one trial that added 5% potassium nitrate to a 10% nano-hydroxyapatite paste and changed nothing else, sponsored by the maker of the pastes, the potassium version eased cold sensitivity further at weeks two, four and six and not at week eight1, and the pooled estimate for the pairing rests on just two randomised trials2.
  • S3 carries potassium nitrate, two forms of hydroxyapatite and 1450 ppm fluoride in one water-based tube, so every brushing carries all of them; that is a fact about the formula, not a result.
  • If you keep two tubes, the pairing that still puts fluoride into every brushing is a potassium nitrate paste with a hydroxyapatite paste that carries fluoride too, and that routine is as untested as the others.

Has anyone tested two sensitivity products used together?

Not two toothpastes. Three PubMed searches were run for this page in September 2026: one for desensitising products used in combination, in sequence or as a regimen, one for a toothpaste used with a mouth rinse, and one for "two dentifrices", "two toothpastes", "alternating dentifrices" or "morning and evening". They returned sixteen, nine and seventeen records. Not one describes a person using two desensitising toothpastes with different actives, whether one after the other, mixed or on alternate brushings.

What has been put to a trial is a second product of a different kind beside a toothpaste, and the table at the end of this section carries every such regimen the searches returned. Read them for their design more than their result, because each one answers a narrower question than a reader holding two tubes is asking.

The closest in spirit is a toothpaste with a matching mouthwash. In an eight-week double-blind randomised trial of 120 adults, sponsored by the maker of the arginine products it tested, a regimen of an arginine toothpaste and an arginine mouthwash reduced touch and air-blast sensitivity more than a regimen of a 5% potassium nitrate toothpaste with a potassium chloride mouthwash, and the potassium regimen did not improve significantly on the touch test3. Each regimen paired a paste with a rinse from the same family of actives, and no arm used a paste without its rinse, so that trial, sponsored by the arginine maker, cannot tell you what the rinse brought3.

The design that does isolate a second product has been run on a potassium nitrate mouthwash. In an eight-week examiner-blinded randomised trial of 191 adults, people who added a 3% potassium nitrate rinse to brushing with a fluoride toothpaste did better on every sensitivity measure, at four weeks and at eight, than people brushing with the same toothpaste alone4. Two companion randomised trials of an experimental 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash, industry-funded and written by authors employed by the funder, used the same comparison and did not agree with each other: in the larger the rinse pulled ahead on air and touch at both visits, and in the smaller only on air, and only at four weeks56. Two authors appear on all three papers, two of which were industry-funded, so they are best read as the work of one group of authors, not as three separate confirmations456.

Stacking treatments, as opposed to products, has had a two-by-two test. Teeth were randomised, 80 of them, to a low-level laser or a sham light, and within each of those to a strontium acetate paste at 8% or a paste with no active, in a double-blind randomised trial; at the seventh-day assessment the teeth that got laser and paste together had done best7. One of the two is a professional treatment, and the result is one week long.

The last row is a toothpaste used after an in-office treatment. In a double-blind randomised pilot trial of 30 adults, funded by Procter & Gamble with two of its employees among the authors, everyone had a professional oxalate treatment and home oxalate strips and was then given either a stannous fluoride or a sodium fluoride toothpaste; sensitivity fell further in both groups over 60 days and the two toothpastes did not differ8. Everyone in that industry-funded pilot had the oxalate and a toothpaste, so it cannot say whether the toothpaste added anything to the oxalate or took anything away8.

RegimenWhat the second product addedDesign and sizeFunder, as declaredWhat separated from the comparison, and whenSource
Arginine toothpaste with arginine mouthwash, against potassium nitrate toothpaste with potassium chloride mouthwash, and a fluoride control regimenA mouthwash from the same family of actives as the paste; no arm used a paste aloneDouble-blind randomised trial, 120 adults, 8 weeksSponsored by the maker of the arginine productsThe arginine regimen reduced touch and air-blast sensitivity most; the potassium regimen did not improve significantly on touch3
Fluoride toothpaste with a 3% potassium nitrate rinse, against the same toothpaste aloneA nerve active the paste did not carryExaminer-blinded randomised trial, 191 adults, 8 weeksNo funding statement in the PubMed recordAhead on every sensitivity measure at 4 and 8 weeks4
The same comparison with an experimental 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash, Study 1 and Study 2 (companion trials)A nerve active the paste did not carryExaminer-blind randomised trials, 216 and 135 adults, 8 weeks eachIndustry-funded; authors employed by the funderStudy 1: ahead on air and touch at 4 and 8 weeks. Study 2: ahead on air at 4 weeks onlyIndustry-funded:56
Low-level laser or sham, each with or without an 8% strontium acetate toothpasteA professional treatment beside a home paste, or the reverseDouble-blind randomised factorial trial, 80 teethNone declaredLaser with the paste best at the seventh-day assessment7
Professional oxalate and home oxalate strips, then a stannous fluoride or a sodium fluoride toothpasteA home toothpaste after an in-office treatment; every arm had bothDouble-blind randomised pilot trial, 30 adults, 60 daysProcter & Gamble; two authors are its employeesBoth groups improved further from the professional treatment; the toothpastes did not differ at day 60Industry-funded:8
Two toothpastes with different desensitising actives, used by one personNo trial found in three PubMed searches, September 2026

What does a two-tube routine actually give each active, and the fluoride?

Half the brushings for each active, and often one fluoride brushing fewer than the NHS advises9. The NHS advice is short: brush your teeth twice a day with fluoride toothpaste9. The government's evidence toolkit for dental teams places those two brushings at last thing at night and one other time, and says it is the fluoride strength printed on the pack that matters10.

Which hydroxyapatite paste goes into the routine decides the fluoride arithmetic. Of the 16 hydroxyapatite toothpastes other than S3 recorded in this site's category review, 13 carry no fluoride and three do; every one of the 12 recorded potassium nitrate toothpastes carries fluoride, S3's among them. A potassium nitrate paste in the morning and a fluoride-free hydroxyapatite paste at night therefore drops the very brushing the toolkit names, and swapping them round keeps the night-time fluoride but still leaves one brushing without it.

The table sets the routines a reader can build from those rows side by side. The brushing counts are arithmetic from the routine, assuming two brushings a day, not measurements of anything.

This page compares ingredients and stated actions only, not clinical performance, based on what each brand states about its own formula. Prices and formulations may change; always check the pack.

RoutineBrushings a day with a potassium saltBrushings a day with hydroxyapatiteBrushings a day with fluorideTested in any trial?Example rowsNote
Potassium nitrate paste in the morning, fluoride-free hydroxyapatite paste at night111, in the morningNoBoots Everyday Sensitive Toothpaste (CR-019) with Bioniq Repair Toothpaste (CR-024)Drops the night-time fluoride brushing the government toolkit names
Fluoride-free hydroxyapatite paste in the morning, potassium nitrate paste at night111, at nightNoThe same two rows, the other way roundKeeps the night-time fluoride brushing; still one short of two
Potassium nitrate paste at one brushing, hydroxyapatite paste with fluoride at the other112NoCR-019 with Georganics Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste Mint (with fluoride) (CR-031, 1350 ppm)Keeps fluoride in every brushing
Both pastes at every brushing, one straight after the other222, or more fluoride per brushing if both pastes carry itNoAny pair aboveTwice the time at the sink; what the second paste does to what the first left behind is unmeasured
Potassium nitrate paste alone, twice a day202Yes, as a single paste: the shape of potassium nitrate toothpaste trialsCR-019Potassium nitrate is on 12 recorded rows, the commonest desensitising active on the shelf
One tube with potassium citrate, hydroxyapatite and fluoride2 (citrate, not nitrate)22No trial of this product cited hereSpotlight Sensitivity + Rebuilding Pro (CR-027)Sodium fluoride, 1450 ppm; levels of the potassium salt and hydroxyapatite not printed
One tube: S32 (nitrate, with potassium chloride)2 (nano and biomimetic)2No trial of this formulaS3 Daily Sensitive Toothpaste (CR-028)Sodium monofluorophosphate, 1450 ppm

Three rows need a sentence. The third is the one this page would point a two-tube reader to if they will not give up either paste: it keeps the potassium nitrate paste they already trust and adds a hydroxyapatite paste that carries its own fluoride, so no brushing goes without. Nobody has tested it either. The first two are not a safety problem: a fluoride-free hydroxyapatite paste is not unsafe, and this page does not suggest it is; what a routine built on one gives up is a fluoride brushing, and nothing more than that9.

Whether one potassium brushing a day does less for the nerve than two has not been measured. The nearest measurement is a single day off: in an industry-funded trial of 127 adults, a day on a placebo paste after four weeks of 5% potassium nitrate lost nothing on touch or air, though the placebo group's readings drifted in the same direction over the same day11. A day is not a routine, and the page on missing a week of potassium nitrate toothpaste covers what happens over a longer gap.

Is it all right to mix two toothpastes on the brush?

Nobody has tested it, and the laboratory work that exists is about something else, so there is no evidence of harm and none of benefit. What the chemistry literature describes is ingredients reacting inside a single tube while it sits on a shelf.

In laboratory storage tests published in 1989, sodium fluoride mixed with calcium- or aluminium-containing toothpaste abrasives lost 60 to 90% of its fluoride after a week, silica bound none, and the calcium abrasives were markedly more compatible with sodium monofluorophosphate than with sodium fluoride12. A 2021 laboratory analysis stirred six commercial calcium-containing toothpastes with water for a minute to imitate brushing: all six held the total fluoride their labels stated, yet only 27 to 61% of it was in a freely available form in the pastes built on calcium carbonate or another poorly soluble calcium, against 97% in a paste whose calcium was stabilised with casein phosphopeptide13. Hydroxyapatite was in neither, and in neither did two pastes meet: one aged its mixtures for a week or longer, the other measured one paste at a time1213.

Formulators do weigh this, inside one tube. S3's answer was to carry its 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate, a salt picked because it leaves the calcium of hydroxyapatite alone in the tube. That is the reason given for one formula's choice of salt. It is not a finding about what happens when a fluoride paste and a hydroxyapatite paste share a brush for two minutes, and none of the laboratory work above should be read as a warning against doing that.

Mixing does cost you one thing, though: information. If the teeth feel easier after a month of two pastes on one brush, there is no telling which paste did it, or whether the month did.

What does putting both actives in one formula add, on the trials that tested it?

Something, at some time points, in trials paid for by the companies that made the pastes. The closest test of this page's pairing is an eight-week double-blind randomised trial in 85 adults, sponsored by the maker of the pastes it tested, which ran a 10% nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste with and without 5% potassium nitrate, each brushed twice a day, beside a 15% nano-hydroxyapatite paste and a calcium sodium phosphosilicate paste1. In the full text of that trial sponsored by the pastes' maker, the version with potassium eased ice-cold water sensitivity more than the same paste without it at weeks two, four and six and not at week eight, eased air sensitivity more at weeks four, six and eight, and never differed from the calcium sodium phosphosilicate comparator at any visit1.

That answers half the question: what potassium adds to a mineral paste. The mirror image, what hydroxyapatite adds to a potassium nitrate paste, has not been published for this pair. The pooled figure that gets quoted for the combination is one node of a network meta-analysis built on two randomised trials and 140 patients2. The newest synthesis of the field, a 2026 systematic review of 93 randomised trials, has no category for this pairing14. The page on potassium nitrate and hydroxyapatite in one tube goes through what the older estimate does and does not rest on.

Other pairings have been through the same with-and-without design. In a trial of 127 adults whose authors are employed or funded by the maker, a paste with 5% potassium nitrate and aluminium lactate was ahead of the same-strength potassium nitrate paste at four and eight weeks11. And in a trial of 101 adults whose record carries no funding statement, two pastes held the same 5% potassium nitrate and differed in fluoride salt and base: the stannous fluoride paste reduced touch and air-blast sensitivity further than the paste carrying sodium monofluorophosphate, the salt S3 uses15. The page on single-active and multi-active sensitivity toothpastes sets every trial of that shape in one table. None of them is potassium nitrate, hydroxyapatite and fluoride measured against its own parts, and none of them is two tubes.

What does one tube with both, like S3, change compared with two tubes?

Every brushing gets every active and the fluoride, which is the difference you can check on the packs; what that does for sensitivity, against two tubes, nobody has tested. S3 lists 5% potassium nitrate with potassium chloride, nano-hydroxyapatite and biomimetic hydroxyapatite, and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate. Brushed morning and night, that is two brushings a day of each active and of fluoride, where the two-tube routines in the table give each active one. Its water base is what lets potassium nitrate and hydroxyapatite share the tube at all.

Three things weigh the other way. No trial has tested S3's combination against its own parts or against a two-tube routine, and the pooled estimate for potassium with hydroxyapatite rests on two randomised trials and 140 patients2. In the one with-and-without trial of the pair, sponsored by the maker of the pastes, the extra relief on cold had gone by week eight while the extra relief on air held1. And the tube that comes closest to S3's combination, Spotlight Sensitivity + Rebuilding Pro, sits on the Boots shelf, while S3 is sold direct from its own site.

Being alone on the ingredient list in the first paragraph is not the same as being best. It says what the published ingredient lists showed in September 2026; it says nothing about how much relief S3 gives compared with either active on its own, or with two tubes. The case for one tube is the job each ingredient does: a sensitive tooth has a nerve that fires too readily and dentine tubules that are open, and most sensitivity toothpastes address one of them. The Journal's article on the two causes of sensitive teeth sets that out for a first-time reader, and the page on what occlusion and nerve desensitisation can each do takes it further.

If you already own both tubes, what should you do?

Put fluoride into both brushings, alter one thing at a time, and leave whatever you settle on in place for weeks before you judge it.

On fluoride, the fix is in the table. If one of your tubes has no fluoride, either pair your potassium nitrate paste with a hydroxyapatite paste that carries fluoride, or put the fluoride-free paste away and brush twice a day with one that has it, as the NHS advises9. The guide to toothpaste with both fluoride and hydroxyapatite goes through the tubes that carry the pair, one at a time.

On judging, one tube tells you something and two tell you very little. The guidelines for trials in this condition, drawn up by an expert committee in 1997, set eight weeks as the length for most trials, with a comparison group beside the paste being tested16. Your own mouth has no comparison group, so the nearest thing to a fair test at home is a single paste, brushed morning and night, for weeks and not days, with nothing else changed; the page on how long to give a new sensitivity toothpaste sets that test out. The Journal's piece on how sensitive toothpastes work and why yours might not be working covers the reasons a paste can seem to fail that have nothing to do with a second tube.

And some pain is not a toothpaste question. The Oral Health Foundation, whose sensitive-teeth page is supported by an educational grant from an oral-care brand, says to see a dentist when the pain is severe, when only one tooth is affected, when it came on suddenly or when the sensitivity has gone on for more than a few weeks, because any of those can mean decay, a crack, gum problems or infection17. For toothache the NHS draws its line at two days18. A second paste treats none of those.

Frequently asked questions

Is using S3 the same as using a potassium nitrate paste and a hydroxyapatite paste?

No trial has compared them, so nobody can say whether the relief would differ. The differences you can check are on the packs: in S3 every brushing carries potassium nitrate, two hydroxyapatites and fluoride, where two tubes give each active one brushing a day; S3's fluoride is sodium monofluorophosphate, where most potassium nitrate pastes use sodium fluoride; and S3 keeps fluoride in both brushings, which a routine built on a fluoride-free hydroxyapatite paste does not.

Can I brush with one paste and then the other straight after?

You can, and nobody has measured what it does. Each active gets both brushings that way, but the second paste goes on straight after the first, and whether it, or the spitting in between, clears away what the first left on the teeth is not known. The Oral Health Foundation's advice for a sensitivity toothpaste is to spit after brushing and not rinse with water17, which a two-paste brushing can keep by spitting between the pastes rather than rinsing. It also doubles the time you spend at the sink, morning and night.

Can I use a potassium nitrate mouthwash with a hydroxyapatite toothpaste?

That exact pairing has not been tested: the rinse trials added a 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash to a plain fluoride toothpaste, two of the three in industry-funded companion trials456. The reviews that pooled potassium mouthwashes disagree. A meta-analysis of nine randomised trials found the rinses ahead of a control rinse on touch and air tests from four weeks19. A meta-analysis of seven placebo-controlled trials, mostly of potassium nitrate, found an effect on how people rated their own sensitivity at eight weeks and none on the probe or the air and cold tests20. The Oral Health Foundation's advice is to use mouthwash at a different time of day from brushing21; the page on potassium nitrate mouthwash against toothpaste and the page on rinsing, mouthwash and timing after brushing go further.

Does using two fluoride toothpastes give me too much fluoride?

Alternating them gives the same two fluoride brushings a day as one tube; brushing with both at the same session puts more paste in your mouth at that brushing, and nobody has measured what that adds for an adult. The nearest evidence is a 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 publications on swallowing toothpaste, covering children and adults and largely children, which found the overall risk of systemic toxicity low and recorded no severe or life-threatening events22. The government toolkit for dental teams calls excessive fluoride ingestion in adults from prescription high-fluoride toothpastes very rare, and its advice for adults is to spit out the excess and avoid rinsing10.

Which toothpastes already contain a potassium salt and hydroxyapatite?

Six of the products recorded in the September 2026 category review pair a potassium salt with hydroxyapatite, and the salt is not the same across them: nitrate, citrate or chloride. The page on potassium nitrate and hydroxyapatite in one tube sets them out with what each gives up, and the category review lists every product with its ingredients.

Where S3 sits

Two tubes make a routine nobody has tested, and the version most people build gives up one of the day's fluoride brushings to fit the second paste in. Hydroxyapatite occludes and potassium desensitises, and since neither does the other's job, a formula built for sensitivity has to carry both. S3 carries both in one tube with fluoride kept beside them, so unlike fluoride-free hydroxyapatite pastes it does not ask you to give up decay protection, and like every other tube on this page it has not been tested against two tubes.

S3 Sensitivity Science™ pairs potassium nitrate with two hydroxyapatites and adult-strength fluoride in one daily paste.

See the toothpaste

In one tube, S3 Sensitivity Science™ puts three actives — potassium nitrate for the nerve, nano-hydroxyapatite inside the tubule and biomimetic hydroxyapatite on the surface — with 1450 ppm fluoride kept in. Calming the nerve, strengthening the enamel surface and protecting against further wear are the three actions the formula is built around. Its formula, S3 Repair Technology™, is patent-pending under UK application GB2604755.5. More than 20 UK dentists are among S3's owners, as investors rather than endorsers. Read more about S3.

References 22 sources

1
Amaechi BT, Lemke KC, Saha S, Luong MN, Gelfond J. Clinical efficacy of nanohydroxyapatite-containing toothpaste at relieving dentin hypersensitivity: an 8 weeks randomized control trial. BDJ Open. 2021;7(1):23. doi:10.1038/s41405-021-00080-7 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 85 adults across four arms, 8 weeks; sponsored by the maker of the test pastes; full text read at PMC8233401.
2
Martins CC, Firmino RT, Riva JJ, Ge L, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Colunga-Lozano LE, Granville-Garcia AF, Costa FO, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Zhang Y, Schünemann HJ. Desensitizing toothpastes for dentin hypersensitivity: a network meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2020;99(5):514-522. doi:10.1177/0022034520903036 Systematic review and network meta-analysis, 125 randomised trials, 12,541 patients; node counts from the supplementary appendix.
3
Elias Boneta AR, Ramirez K, Naboa J, Mateo LR, Stewart B, Panagokos F, De Vizio W. Efficacy in reducing dentine hypersensitivity of a regimen using a toothpaste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate, a mouthwash containing 0.8% arginine, pyrophosphate and PVM/MA copolymer and a toothbrush compared to potassium and negative control regimens: an eight-week randomized clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41 Suppl 1. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.011 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 120 adults, 8 weeks; sponsored by the maker of the arginine products.
4
Hall C, Sufi F, Milleman JL, Milleman KR. Efficacy of a 3% potassium nitrate mouthrinse for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity: an 8-week randomized controlled study. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2018.10.023 Examiner-blinded randomised controlled trial, 191 adults, 8 weeks.
5
Hall C, Sufi F, Wang N, Goyal CR. Efficacy of an experimental 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash in providing long-term relief from dentin hypersensitivity: an 8-week randomized controlled study (Study 1). American Journal of Dentistry. 2017;30(1):27-34. PMID 29178711. Examiner-blind randomised controlled trial, 216 randomised, 8 weeks; industry-funded.
6
Hall C, Sufi F, Constantin P. Efficacy of an experimental 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash in providing long-term relief from dentin hypersensitivity: an 8-week randomized controlled study (Study 2). American Journal of Dentistry. 2017. PMID 29251457. Examiner-blind randomised controlled trial, 135 adults, 8 weeks; industry-funded.
7
Barros APO, de Melo Alencar C, de Melo Pingarilho Carneiro A, da Silva Pompeu D, Barbosa GM, Araújo JLN, Silva CM. Combination of two desensitizing protocols to control dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022;26(2):1299-1307. doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04104-2 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, four arms, 80 teeth.
8
Anderson CJ, Kugel G, Zou Y, Ferrari M, Gerlach R. A randomized, controlled, two-month pilot trial of stannous fluoride dentifrice versus sodium fluoride dentifrice after oxalate treatment for dentinal hypersensitivity. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020;24(11):4043-4049. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03275-8 Double-blind randomised pilot trial, 30 adults, 60 days; industry-funded.
9
NHS. Take care of your teeth and gums. https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/healthy-teeth-and-gums/take-care-of-your-teeth-and-gums/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
10
GOV.UK. Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention. Chapter 9: fluoride. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention/chapter-9-fluoride Accessed 2026-09-10.
11
Ishii K, Suzuki T, Akabane C, Iizumi G, Suzuki N, Fukuda Y, Suzuki K, Kawaguchi N, Zhu R, Li D, Zhou Z, Hu D. Toothpastes containing potassium nitrate alone versus potassium nitrate combined with aluminum lactate in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial. BDJ Open. 2026;12(1). doi:10.1038/s41405-026-00452-x Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 127 adults, three arms, 8 weeks; industry-funded.
12
Hattab FN. The state of fluorides in toothpastes. Journal of Dentistry. 1989;17(2):47-54. PMID 2732364. In vitro study of fluoride salts, abrasives and stored toothpastes.
13
Shen P, Fernando JR, Yuan Y, Walker GD, Reynolds C, Reynolds EC. Bioavailable fluoride in calcium-containing dentifrices. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):146. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80503-x In vitro analysis of six commercial toothpastes.
14
Gormley AJ, Walsh T, Twigg J, Farrugia C, Pollard A, Bullock B, West NX. Dentifrice formulations for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Periodontology 2000. 2026. doi:10.1111/prd.70088 Systematic review and network meta-analysis, 93 randomised trials, 9,548 participants.
15
Schiff T, Bonta Y, Proskin HM, DeVizio W, Petrone M, Volpe AR. Desensitizing efficacy of a new dentifrice containing 5.0% potassium nitrate and 0.454% stannous fluoride. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000. PMID 11763944. Examiner-blind randomised controlled trial, 101 completed per protocol, 8 weeks; no funding statement in the record.
16
Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x Consensus guideline from an expert committee.
17
Oral Health Foundation. Sensitive teeth. https://www.dentalhealth.org/sensitive-teeth Accessed 2026-09-10.
18
NHS. Toothache. https://www.nhs.uk/symptoms/toothache/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
19
da Silva A, Deschamps Muniz RP, Almeida Lago MC, da Silva Júnior EP, Braz R. Clinical efficacy of mouthwashes with potassium salts in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Operative Dentistry. 2023. doi:10.2341/21-181-LIT Systematic review and meta-analysis, nine randomised trials.
20
Molina A, García-Gargallo M, Montero E, Tobías A, Sanz M, Martín C. Clinical efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for the control of dentin hypersensitivity and root sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2017. doi:10.1111/idh.12250 Systematic review and meta-analysis, seven randomised placebo-controlled trials.
21
Oral Health Foundation. Mouthwash. https://www.dentalhealth.org/mouthwash Accessed 2026-09-10.
22
Petrović B, Kojić S, Milić L, Luzio A, Perić T, Marković E, Stojanović GM. Toothpaste ingestion: evaluating the problem and ensuring safety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1279915. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1279915 Systematic review and meta-analysis, 18 publications.