The toothpaste
Guide

Gum recession and sensitivity: why exposed root surface hurts, and what daily care can do.

Gum recession hurts only where the root it uncovers has dentine tubules open to the mouth and a nerve ready to answer them, so the daily answer is a toothpaste that narrows those tubules, quietens the nerve and keeps fluoride on the bare root. It does nothing to the gum itself, which does not grow back with home care and only moves with a periodontist. The paradox in the middle of the subject is that recession is close to universal and mostly painless: in one survey every one of 349 young UK adults examined had some1. Yet in a population sample of 1,023 adults aged 35 and over, only about one receded tooth in ten was sensitive2. S3 Sensitivity Science™ is one paste built on that two-part logic, and its pack declares the parts: 5% potassium nitrate, a nano and a biomimetic hydroxyapatite, and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate.

What was checked33 peer-reviewed studies, S3 consumer trial (ADSL, 2026), guidance from the NHS and the Oral Health Foundation; 63-record search

Key points
  • Recession on its own is not a reason to buy a sensitivity toothpaste, because most receded teeth never hurt: in the one population study that counted teeth, about one in ten with recession was sensitive2.
  • What turns a bare root into a sore one is an open tubule with a nerve behind it, and at the neck of many teeth enamel and cementum never met in the first place, so dentine can lie exposed before the gum has moved at all34.
  • Recession creeps by less than half a millimetre on average over four years in a population cohort that measured it, and new recession turned up more often in people with advanced gum disease, which is the part of the process daily cleaning can reach5.
  • S3 is designed for the receded root that hurts, the case where open tubules and a nerve that fires too easily are present together.
  • No toothpaste moves the gum line, S3 included; surgery is the one treatment with pooled evidence for taking sensitivity away at a receded root, and none of the trials behind that evidence compared it with a toothpaste67.

Does gum recession cause sensitivity, and what toothpaste helps?

Recession sets up sensitivity rather than causing it outright. When the gum margin slips down a tooth it uncovers root, which has no enamel over it, and the Oral Health Foundation describes what follows: dentine, full of tiny channels linked to the nerve, is exposed, and heat, cold or sweetness can reach the nerve8. A 2017 review of how teeth change with age goes further and names gingival recession as the main cause both of dentine hypersensitivity and of decay on the root9.

The toothpaste question follows from that picture. A paste can work at the mouth of the tubule, narrowing or plugging it, or it can work on the nerve, and a clinical review of how recession is managed names a desensitising toothpaste as the first step for a receded tooth that hurts, with other desensitisers and then bonding agents only if relief is not enough10. The same review notes that every one of these pastes needs time before a person notices relief10. A UK guideline review for general dental practice adds the caution that there does not currently appear to be one ideal desensitising agent to recommend11, which is why this page talks about jobs a paste has to do rather than a winner.

There is a hole in the evidence. Almost nobody has tested a toothpaste in people recruited because their gums had receded. A PubMed search on the tenth of September 2026 for gum recession, toothpaste and sensitivity together in the title or abstract returned twenty-three records, most of them surveys, reviews and tests of other treatments. One was a double-blind randomised trial that recruited 90 adults on sensitive receded teeth and compared toothpastes alone: a herbal paste, the same herbal paste with 0.7% potassium nitrate, and a conventional 5% potassium nitrate paste12. All three lowered pain scores to touch and to air over four weeks, the herbal paste with added potassium nitrate gave the lowest scores at four weeks, and uneven drop-out left only 22 teeth in the conventional arm for the touch test12. That trial had no placebo arm, and its authors ask for one next time because tubules can close on their own12.

How common is recession, and why do most receded teeth not hurt?

Recession is close to universal, and most of it is silent. Seong and colleagues examined 349 adults in the UK arm of a European survey of young people; every one of them had lost gum on at least one tooth, and the deepest site in 42% of them measured between four and eight millimetres1. A 2024 examination of 3,551 adults across seven European countries, funded by Haleon, which makes sensitivity toothpaste, recorded recession of 1 mm or more in 87.9% of participants, and a corrigendum to that paper exists whose content could not be read13. A class of dental students followed into their forties as dentists reached 100%: at the fifteen-year re-examination all 27 of them had recession14.

Pain is a different count. In a population sample of 1,023 adults aged 35 and over in Porto Alegre, Brazil, examined at home with an air blast and a probe, about a third had dentine hypersensitivity, it usually involved about one tooth per affected person, and only about one tooth in ten with gum recession was sensitive2. That is the only population figure this page could find for the share of receded teeth that hurt. A PubMed search on the same date for recession, dentine hypersensitivity and prevalence terms returned sixty-three records, and the candidate abstracts checked from it count sensitive people, or the share of sensitive teeth that sit next to recession, instead. So the one-in-ten figure is written here as "in one population study", from a Brazilian city, and not as a law of nature.

The ratio is not the whole story, because there is a gradient inside it. In the young UK survey, the more recession a person had, the more sensitive their teeth were on their own report and on the examiner's score1. In a Colombian case-control study of 61 people with sensitivity and 122 matched controls, gingival recession went with roughly twice the odds of the condition, an odds ratio of 2.215. Put the three findings together and the sense of it is plain enough: recession opens the door, a deeper recession opens it wider, and whether a particular root actually hurts depends on what is going on inside its dentine.

Silent recession can still matter to the person who has it. In a population study of 740 Brazilian adults aged 35 to 59, having at least one tooth with 2 mm or more of recession went with about twice the odds of a noticeably worse oral health-related quality of life, the effect sat in the front teeth rather than the back, and sensitivity and appearance were what linked the two16. Three of the rows below come from the same Porto Alegre research programme, so they are not three independent samples.

StudyWho and whereDesign and fundingWhat it found about recessionWhat it found about sensitivity
Seong et al. 2018349 young adults, UK arm of a European surveyCross-sectional survey; no funding declaration in the record1Every participant had recession on at least one tooth; 42% had a deepest site of 4–8 mmMore recession went with more sensitivity; many receded teeth were not sensitive
Costa et al. 20141,023 adults aged 35 and over, Porto Alegre, BrazilCross-sectional population sample; no funding declaration in the record2Recession was one of the factors associated with sensitivity33.4% (air) and 34.2% (probe) of people; about 10% of teeth with recession were sensitive; people over 60 less affected
West et al. 20243,551 adults, seven European countriesCross-sectional; funded by Haleon; a corrigendum exists, content unread13Recession of 1 mm or more in 87.9%Sensitivity associated with recession and with erosive wear
West et al. 2026The same 3,551 adultsCross-sectional; funded by Haleon17Recession on the cheek side associated with moderate or severe sensitivity29.1% had at least one moderately or severely sensitive tooth, most often lower front teeth on the cheek side
Rios et al. 2021402 adults followed for about four years, Porto AlegrePopulation cohort; no funding declaration in the record535.9% of teeth free of cheek-side recession developed it; mean progression 0.40 mm; faster with periodontitisNot measured
Matas and Mendieta 202427 dentists from one dental-school classFifteen-year follow-up; no funding declaration in the record14100% had recession; mean height rose by 0.19 mmNot measured
Wagner et al. 2016740 adults aged 35–59, Porto AlegreCross-sectional population sample; no funding declaration in the record162 mm or more: about twice the odds of worse oral health-related quality of lifeSensitivity on its own was not linked to quality of life; alongside recession it strengthened the link

What is on an exposed root that makes it react?

Open dentine, with a nerve at the far end of it. Dentine is threaded with microscopic tubules running in towards the pulp, and the working account since Brännström's 1966 review is that a stimulus such as cold air or a bristle moves the fluid inside open tubules and the movement excites nerve endings near the pulp18. That account, and the newer detail around it, has its own page on the hydrodynamic theory of tooth sensitivity, and the Journal explains what dentine tubules are for anyone who wants the anatomy drawn out.

What the gum uncovers was not always well covered to begin with. Where the enamel of the crown meets the cementum of the root, the two tissues are supposed to meet or overlap, and often they do not. In a laboratory imaging study of 100 extracted human teeth, examined every half millimetre around the neck, 36.5% of the observation points showed a gap in which dentine lay bare between enamel and cementum3. A light-microscope study of 67 extracted premolars, by a different group, found such gaps in roughly a third of its sample and an arrangement that changed irregularly around a single tooth4. Those are extracted teeth on a bench, not a count of anybody's sore teeth. They help explain why a small recession can matter at one tooth and not at its neighbour: at some points on some necks the gum was the only cover the dentine had.

The dentine itself changes with age, which is part of why the same root can behave differently in middle age and in old age. A 2017 review describes secondary dentine forming and the tubules narrowing over the years, the process called dentine sclerosis9. In the Porto Alegre sample, adults of 60 and over were less likely than those aged 35 to 49 to have sensitivity at all, with an odds ratio of 0.472. The sclerosis account fits that pattern, but nobody has followed the same people's sensitivity across decades to show it, and the page on who gets sensitive teeth and at what age sets out the age curve and its dissent.

Why do gums recede, and how fast?

Slowly, and for more than one reason. The best measure of pace is a four-year population cohort of 402 adults aged 35 and over in Porto Alegre: of the teeth that started with no recession on the cheek side, 35.9% developed it, and recession already present advanced by a mean of 0.40 mm5. New recession was commoner in people with advanced periodontitis, 42.3% of teeth against 29.5% in people without it, and in teeth that had lost attachment between them, 38.5% against 7.6%5. The dentists' cohort shows the same creep in people who know exactly how to look after their gums: over fifteen years their recessions multiplied and the average depth grew by a fraction of a millimetre while their brushing habits stayed nearly unchanged14. A clinical review of recession treatment states that untreated recession tends to keep moving towards the root even in well-motivated patients10.

The causes are a list of risks rather than a single culprit. The consensus review written for the 2017 World Workshop on periodontal classification names thin gum tissue as a greater risk, says inadequate oral hygiene, orthodontic treatment and fillings at the neck of the tooth might raise it, and notes that recession turns up in populations with high as well as low standards of hygiene19. Gum disease is the cause that daily care reaches most directly. The NHS lists gums shrinking among the things gum disease can lead to20, and the Oral Health Foundation explains that periodontal disease damages the bone and tissue holding the teeth and can make the gums pull away from them, and that while gingivitis can be reversed, periodontal disease can only be controlled21.

Brushing is the cause people blame first, and the evidence does not convict it. A 2007 systematic review of 18 studies found that eight of 17 observational studies linked how often people brushed with recession, two found no relationship, none met every quality criterion, and the authors concluded the data could neither support nor refute an association22. The full argument over whether brushing started a particular recession belongs to the page on brushing and receding gums, not to this one.

Why do teeth get more sensitive after gum treatment?

Because cleaning a diseased root surface exposes it, and the extra sensitivity tends to ease over the following weeks. In the Colombian case-control study, having had periodontal therapy carried the strongest association with dentine sensitivity of any factor examined, an odds ratio of 5.36, ahead of recession itself and the abrasivity of the toothpaste people used15. That design measures association, so it cannot say why, though a treatment that uncovers root dentine is the obvious candidate.

The prospective numbers come from small studies, and they point the same way. Tammaro and colleagues followed 35 patients through non-surgical periodontal treatment: pain scores to a puff of air fell while they kept up meticulous plaque control on its own, then rose after scaling and root planing, with more teeth responding23. Most of those rises were moderate, only nine of the 35 patients had an increase of more than 2 cm on the pain scale in three or more teeth, and four weeks after scaling the intensity was easing while the share of sensitive teeth had not yet dropped23. After surgery the curve is steeper. In a clinical study of ten patients measured weekly after open-flap gum surgery, the combined share of tactile and thermal sensitivity was 30% before the operation, 79% a week afterwards and 45% at six weeks, coming down without any desensitising treatment24.

Whether a desensitiser helps in that window has been pooled once, and the answer is not flattering to desensitisers. A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomised trials after non-surgical periodontal therapy found the agents reduced pain to water and to air, at low to very low certainty, while on the mechanical stimulus the control groups did better than the treated ones; its authors drew no firm conclusion25. One double-blind randomised trial of 48 patients, using a nano-carbonate apatite paste (a different material from hydroxyapatite), found an advantage over a control paste at four weeks that had narrowed to borderline or non-significant by six26.

The practical reading is short. Sensitivity after a deep clean is expected, it was mostly mild where it has been measured, and it eased over weeks; it is a reason to keep the cleaning going, and a reason to tell the hygienist if one tooth stays sharp, not a reason to stop treatment for the gums.

What can daily care change on a receded gumline, and what can it not?

Daily care can change what the exposed dentine and its nerve do, how well the bare root resists decay, and the gum inflammation that speeds recession; it cannot change where the gum sits. Each of those three is a different job, and the evidence behind each is of a different strength.

On the nerve side, potassium salts are the long-standing active; their standing comes from the clinical record, and their mechanism is still a proposal. The working model is that potassium ions reaching the nerve endings through open tubules make them slower to fire, a model that a review of the potassium trials says has never been confirmed in an intact human tooth27; a 1996 review in the journal Pain argued that fluid flowing outwards along the tubule is a bigger barrier to potassium moving in than earlier estimates allowed28. The 2006 Cochrane review of six trials of 5% potassium nitrate paste found reductions on air and on touch at six to eight weeks, no significant change in what patients reported about their own sensitivity, and no clear evidence overall29. Relief from a nerve active builds rather than arrives: in a double-blind randomised trial of 120 adults funded by Procter & Gamble, the potassium nitrate paste's advantage over a plain fluoride paste on cold air grew from a small margin at day three to 44.3% at week eight, and three weeks after everyone had switched to the plain paste it still stood at 35.8%30. How that build-up unfolds week by week has its own page on relief that builds over weeks.

On the tubule side, a 2026 network meta-analysis of 93 randomised trials gave nano-hydroxyapatite a large two-week reduction on the cold-air score with moderate confidence, but from two studies only, and potassium a small but important effect with low confidence; the best-supported two-week results in that analysis belonged to stannous fluoride and arginine, neither of which is in S331. The pairing S3 relies on, potassium with hydroxyapatite, appears in a 2020 network meta-analysis as a node holding two randomised trials and 140 patients32. Some of any early improvement belongs to no active at all: a 2019 network meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials measured a significant placebo effect in this kind of trial, and fluoride paste was not significantly different from placebo in it33.

Fluoride on the root is the second job, and it is about decay as much as comfort. The 2017 age review that names recession as the main cause of sensitivity names it as the main cause of root caries too9. A narrative review of the fluoride literature concluded that fluoride toothpaste has a fair effect on sensitive teeth when it is combined with an agent that obstructs dentine fluid, such as a potassium salt, and made its case for high-strength fluoride on the grounds of root caries rather than sensitivity34. The Oral Health Foundation's own advice for sensitive teeth is to spit out after brushing and not to rinse with water8.

Gum inflammation is the third job, and it is the one that touches recession itself. In the four-year cohort, new recession appeared more often in people with advanced periodontitis5; in the periodontal treatment study, sensitivity scores fell during the weeks of meticulous plaque control alone, and its authors conclude that such plaque control diminishes root sensitivity23. The NHS routine for keeping gum disease away is a fluoride toothpaste at least twice a day with a spit and no rinse, cleaning between the teeth every day with floss or interdental brushes, regular check-ups and not smoking20. For the exposed root itself, the Oral Health Foundation recommends a soft brush, brushing gently in small circular movements without pressing, and an hour's wait after acidic food or drink before brushing8.

What daily care does not do is bring gum back. A PubMed search on the tenth of September 2026 for recession described as spontaneous, reversing, regrowing or creeping returned seventy-seven records. The reports of gum edging back up a root concern the months after a gum graft, or teeth moved back into the bone by orthodontic treatment; none describes an adult's receded gum returning with brushing, cleaning or a toothpaste. The Oral Health Foundation says the same thing about the disease behind much of it: periodontal disease cannot be reversed, only controlled21.

The table below sets each layer a receded root exposes against what daily care and a clinician can each change, with S3's declared actives where they belong; its hydroxyapatite percentages are inclusion levels of the ingredient as supplied, and the active content is lower.

Layer or problemWhat happensWhat daily care changes, and how strong the evidence isWhat only a dentist or periodontist changesSources
The gum marginMoves slowly towards the root; new recession appeared on 35.9% of teeth free of cheek-side recession over about four years in one cohortNothing moves it back. Plaque control and a soft brush aim to slow further loss: guidance and a clinical review, no trial of home care on progressionRoot coverage surgery: sensitivity suppressed in 70.8% of cases across 13 randomised trials and 1,086 recessions, every trial comparing surgical techniques5106
Cementum and the enamel junction at the neckAt about a third of observation points on extracted teeth, enamel and cementum never met and dentine was bareNothing restores itA filling over a worn notch near the gumline348
Open dentine tubulesCold air, sweetness or a bristle moves fluid in the open tubuleOccluding actives narrow the openings: nano-hydroxyapatite moderate confidence on cold air at two weeks, from two studies; stannous fluoride and arginine best supported, and not in S3. S3 declares 10% nano-hydroxyapatite and 5% biomimetic hydroxyapatite as supplied, with a lower active contentIn-chair desensitisers, then bonding agents over the exposed dentine183110
The nerve's responseNerve endings near the pulp fire too readilyPotassium: reductions on air and touch in trials at six to eight weeks, patients' own reports not significantly changed, mechanism unconfirmed in an intact tooth; relief builds over weeks. S3 declares 5% potassium nitrateOther in-chair desensitising treatments for a tooth that does not settle292730, an industry-funded trial
Decay on the root surfaceRecession is named as the main cause of root cariesFluoride toothpaste twice a day, spat out and not rinsed. S3 keeps 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphateHigher-strength fluoride prescribed for root caries9348
Gum inflammationPlaque inflames the gum; periodontitis damages the bone and can make gums pull away; linked with more new recessionBrushing twice a day and cleaning between teeth daily; gingivitis reversible, periodontal disease controlledDeep cleaning under the gum, which raises sensitivity for some weeks; referral to a specialist21523

Where does S3 fit on a receded gumline, and where does it stop?

It fits the part of the job a toothpaste can do, and it stops at the gum line. Hydroxyapatite works on the open tubule and potassium on the nerve, and neither does the other's work, which is the reason for carrying both in one paste. In S3 the potassium is there for the nerve, the nano-hydroxyapatite is meant to work inside the tubule and the biomimetic hydroxyapatite on the surface. Its fluoride is sodium monofluorophosphate at 1450 ppm, chosen because it does not react with the calcium in hydroxyapatite inside the tube, so a bare root keeps adult-strength decay protection. It is made to be the ordinary toothpaste brushed with twice a day for years, not a fortnight's course. S3 is judged after two to four weeks of twice-daily brushing, because relief from potassium and from mineral builds over weeks rather than on the first morning.

The one consumer figure on this page comes with its conditions. In S3's own consumer trial, run by the independent agency ADSL and recording what panellists said rather than what an instrument read, 88% said at the two-week point that S3 helps manage their sensitive teeth effectively. The approved summary of that trial does not say whether its panellists had recession, so the figure is no result for receded roots in particular.

Three limits belong in the same section, because they cost this product something. No toothpaste, S3 included, moves the gum line: the only treatment with pooled evidence for removing sensitivity at a receded root is surgery, and none of the trials behind that evidence compared it with a toothpaste67. No trial has tested S3's combination in people recruited on recession; the single randomised toothpaste trial recruited that way tested a herbal paste and potassium nitrate12, and the one other toothpaste study in this library recruited on recession, a fourteen-day non-randomised trial of 40 young adults, set a nano-hydroxyapatite paste against brushing with no toothpaste at all35. And the pooled estimate for potassium paired with hydroxyapatite rests on two randomised trials, which is too few to call an evidence base32. Why a tooth can need both a nerve active and a tubule active at once is set out on the page about two problems in one tooth, and the Journal's piece on the two causes of sensitive teeth covers the same ground for a general reader.

When does recession need a dentist or a periodontist?

When it is moving, bleeding, notched, confined to one tooth, or hurting in a way that lingers. The Oral Health Foundation's signs that sensitivity has become a dentist's question are pain that is severe, sensitivity that has gone on for more than a few weeks, one tooth rather than several, and pain that arrives suddenly, any of which can mean decay, a crack, gum problems or infection8. Gums that bleed when you brush or eat something hard, or that are sore and swollen, are the NHS's reason to book a dental appointment, and very sore gums or teeth that are becoming loose make it urgent20. Toothache is a different complaint from sensitivity: the NHS asks you to see a dentist when it lasts more than two days, or comes with a temperature, pain on biting or a swollen face36.

A notch you can catch with a fingernail at the gumline is also worth showing, because a dentist can place a filling over a worn area near the gum, where no toothpaste can8. If recession keeps advancing despite careful cleaning, or the twinge keeps climbing on a sensitivity paste, the page on the other causes to rule out goes through the other explanations.

A receded site with no disease around it is usually watched. The 2017 World Workshop consensus says monitoring seems the proper approach in that case, and that surgery to thicken the gum or cover the root may be indicated when the risk of progression and root damage is raised, or for appearance19. A referral letter may describe the recession as RT1, RT2 or RT310. Those labels measure how much attachment has been lost between the teeth: none in RT1, no more than on the cheek side in RT2, and more than on the cheek side in RT3, and the deeper the recession and the thinner the gum, the less likely a graft is to cover the whole root10.

When surgery is done, it has the highest reported rate of taking sensitivity away of anything in this literature. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomised trials, 701 patients and 1,086 recessions found sensitivity suppressed after root coverage in 70.8% of cases, and more often the more of the root was covered6. A 2023 meta-analysis of 19 randomised trials and 784 recession defects put the reduction in the risk of sensitivity at 67% without a stimulus and 53% with one7. Both reviews compare one surgical technique with another67. Neither, then, can say how surgery would fare against a toothpaste, and root coverage is a decision about a particular receded site, taken on its depth and the gum around it, not a general answer to sensitive teeth. What a lifetime of looking after sensitive teeth involves beyond that decision is on the page about managing sensitivity long term, and the Journal's guide to how to stop sensitive teeth pain covers the everyday routine.

Frequently asked questions

Can S3 make receding gums grow back?

No. S3 is designed to act on the exposed dentine and the nerve behind it, with potassium for the nerve and hydroxyapatite for the tubule and the surface, and nothing in it changes where the gum sits. Receded gum does not come back with any home care; the treatment that moves the margin back over a root is surgery, and a periodontist judges whether a site needs it or only needs watching1019.

Why does only one of my receded teeth hurt?

Because recession opens the way and does not decide the outcome. In the one population study that counted, about one tooth in ten with recession was sensitive, so a single sore tooth among several receded ones is the ordinary pattern2. The neck of each tooth is built slightly differently, too: in extracted premolars the meeting of enamel and cementum varied irregularly even around one tooth4. One tooth that hurts on its own is still one of the Oral Health Foundation's reasons to have it checked, because decay and cracks can feel the same8.

Is sensitivity after a deep clean normal, and how long does it last?

Yes, and in the studies that followed it, it faded over weeks. Scaling below the gum increased the number of teeth that answered a puff of air in 35 patients, though for most of them the rise was modest23. After gum surgery, sensitivity peaked in the first week and was coming down by the sixth without any treatment, in a study of only ten patients24. If one tooth is still sharp after a few weeks, mention it to your dentist.

Did I cause my recession by brushing too hard?

Nobody can say that about your mouth, and the research has not settled it for anyone's. The systematic review that looked hardest found the data inconclusive either way22, and an earlier narrative review, whose funding is not stated, describes the case against the toothbrush as circumstantial37. Recession turns up in people with excellent hygiene as well as poor19, so a gentler brush is worth adopting for what it protects from now on, not as an admission about the past.

Should I see a periodontist?

Start with your dentist, who can measure the recession, look for gum disease and refer you to a specialist if it is needed20. A specialist opinion makes most sense when a receded site is getting worse or you want to know whether a root can be covered, which is when the World Workshop consensus sees a case for surgery19.

Where S3 sits

A receded root that hurts has two things wrong together, tubules open to the mouth and a nerve that answers too quickly, and S3 is made for exactly that combination. Hydroxyapatite and potassium each do one of those jobs and neither can stand in for the other, so a paste built for this needs both. Where the gum line itself sits is a periodontist's question, and no toothpaste answers it.

S3 Sensitivity Science™ pairs potassium nitrate with two hydroxyapatites and adult-strength fluoride in one daily paste.

See the toothpaste

S3 Sensitivity Science™ is a daily toothpaste that puts 5% potassium nitrate beside two hydroxyapatites, a nano form at 10% and a biomimetic form at 5%, both as solution, with full adult-strength fluoride. Its three stated actions are calming the nerve, strengthening the enamel surface and protecting against further wear. The formula is filed as S3 Repair Technology™, patent-pending under UK application GB2604755.5. Its owners include more than 20 UK dentists, each of whom invested in the business. Read more about S3.

References 37 sources

1
Seong J, Bartlett D, Newcombe RG, Claydon NCA, Hellin N, West NX. Prevalence of gingival recession and study of associated related factors in young UK adults. Journal of Dentistry. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.005 Cross-sectional survey of 349 young UK adults, an observation and not a trial; no funding declaration in the record.
2
Costa RS, Rios FS, Moura MS, Jardim JJ, Maltz M, Haas AN. Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult and elderly populations from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Journal of Periodontology, 85(9):1247-1258. 2014. doi:10.1902/jop.2014.130728 Cross-sectional population-based study, 1,023 adults aged 35 and over; no funding declaration in the record.
3
Araveti SK, Hiraishi N, Kominami N, Otsuki M, Sumi Y, Yiu CKY, Tagami J. Swept-source optical coherence tomographic observation on prevalence and variations of cemento-enamel junction morphology. Lasers in Medical Science. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10103-019-02847-9 In vitro optical coherence tomography study of 100 extracted human teeth.
4
Arambawatta K, Peiris R, Nanayakkara D. Morphology of the cemento-enamel junction in premolar teeth. Journal of Oral Science. 2009. doi:10.2334/josnusd.51.623 In vitro light-microscopy study of 67 extracted premolars.
5
Rios FS, Costa RSA, Wagner TP, Christofoli BR, Goergen J, Izquierdo C, Jardim JJ, Maltz M, Haas AN. Incidence and progression of gingival recession over 4 years: A population-based longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2021. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13383 Prospective population cohort, 402 adults followed for about four years; no funding declaration in the record.
6
Antezack A, Ohanessian R, Sadowski C, Faure-Brac M, Brincat A, Etchecopar-Etchart D, Monnet-Corti V. Effectiveness of surgical root coverage on dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2022. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13664 Systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomised trials, 701 patients and 1,086 recessions.
7
Kotsailidi EA, Michelogiannakis D, Barmak AB, Madianos P, Caton J, Tsigarida A. Root coverage surgery for dentin hypersensitivity reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Quintessence International. 2023. doi:10.3290/j.qi.b3931397 Systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 randomised trials, 486 patients and 784 recession defects.
8
Oral Health Foundation. Sensitive teeth. https://www.dentalhealth.org/sensitive-teeth Accessed 2026-09-10.
9
Carvalho TS, Lussi A. Age-related morphological, histological and functional changes in teeth. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2017. doi:10.1111/joor.12474 Narrative review.
10
Imber JC, Kasaj A. Treatment of Gingival Recession: When and How?. International Dental Journal. 2021. doi:10.1111/idj.12617 Narrative review, open-access full text read.
11
Gillam DG. A new perspective on dentine hypersensitivity: guidelines for general dental practice. Dental Update. 2017. doi:10.12968/denu.2017.44.1.33 Review, clinical guidelines for UK general dental practice.
12
Vajrabhaya LO, Benjasupattananan S, Sappayatosok K, Sirikururat P, Korsuwannawong S, Dechosilpa V. Comparison of Herbal and Potassium Nitrate Toothpastes in Managing Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dentistry Journal (Basel). 2025. doi:10.3390/dj13080369 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 90 adults with sensitive receded teeth, four weeks; publicly funded, authors declare no conflicts; registered after completion.
13
West NX, Davies M, Sculean A, Jepsen S, Faria-Almeida R, Harding M, Graziani F, Newcombe RG, Creeth JE, Herrera D. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity, erosive tooth wear, gingival recession and periodontal health in seven European countries. Journal of Dentistry. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105364 Cross-sectional survey of 3,551 adults, not a trial; funded by Haleon; a corrigendum exists (PMID 39577273) whose content could not be read.
14
Matas F, Mendieta C. A long-term longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists: A 15-year follow-up. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2024. doi:10.1111/idh.12745 Longitudinal cohort, 27 dentists followed over 15 years; no funding declaration in the record.
15
Mafla AC, Lopez-Moncayo LF. Dentine sensitivity risk factors: a case-control study. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.175678 Case-control study, 61 cases and 122 matched controls, an observation and not a trial.
16
Wagner TP, Costa RS, Rios FS, Moura MS, Maltz M, Jardim JJ, Haas AN. Gingival recession and oral health-related quality of life: a population-based cross-sectional study in Brazil. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2016. doi:10.1111/cdoe.12226 Cross-sectional population-based study, 740 adults aged 35 to 59, an observation and not a trial.
17
West NX, Newcombe RG, Alonso B, Araoz A, Cosgarea R, Creeth J, Daly S, Davies M, Dias J, Faria-Almeida R, Gennai S, Graziani F, Griffith L, Harding M, Herrera D, Hellin N, Jepsen S, Legido B, Rioboo M, Prosper M, Seong J, Staehli A, Sculean A. Dentine hypersensitivity and associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data in seven European countries. Journal of Dentistry. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106313 Cross-sectional survey of the same 3,551 adults, not a trial; funded by Haleon.
18
Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 21(4):517-526. 1966. PMID 5218158. Review; cited only for the attribution of the hydrodynamic theory, no abstract deposited.
19
Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. Journal of Periodontology. 2018. doi:10.1002/JPER.16-0671 Narrative review with case definitions, 2017 World Workshop consensus; also published in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology.
20
NHS. Gum disease. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gum-disease/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
21
Oral Health Foundation. Bleeding gums: recognise and treat gum disease. https://www.dentalhealth.org/gum-disease Accessed 2026-09-10.
22
Rajapakse PS, McCracken GI, Gwynnett E, Steen ND, Guentsch A, Heasman PA. Does tooth brushing influence the development and progression of non-inflammatory gingival recession? A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01149.x Systematic review of 18 studies (one randomised trial reported as an abstract, 17 observational studies).
23
Tammaro S, Wennström JL, Bergenholtz G. Root-dentin sensitivity following non-surgical periodontal treatment. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000. doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009690.x Non-randomised clinical trial, 35 patients followed through non-surgical periodontal treatment, no control group.
24
Al-Sabbagh M, Beneduce C, Andreana S, Ciancio SG. Incidence and time course of dentinal hypersensitivity after periodontal surgery. General Dentistry. 2010. PMID 20129876. Non-randomised clinical study, 14 patients enrolled and 10 completing, no control group.
25
de Oliveira RP, Alencar CM, Silva FA, Magno MB, Maia LC, Silva CM. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin hypersensitivity after non-surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103498 Systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomised trials.
26
Ding PH, Dai A, Hu HJ, Huang JP, Liu JM, Chen LL. Efficacy of nano-carbonate apatite dentifrice in relief from dentine hypersensitivity following non-surgical periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health, 20:170. 2020. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01157-9 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 48 patients randomised.
27
Orchardson R, Gillam DG. The efficacy of potassium salts as agents for treating dentin hypersensitivity. Journal of Orofacial Pain. 2000. PMID 11203743. Narrative review of potassium toothpaste trials.
28
McCormack K, Davies R. The enigma of potassium ion in the management of dentine hypersensitivity: is nitric oxide the elusive second messenger?. Pain. 1996. PMID 9251993. Review and hypothesis paper.
29
Poulsen S, Errboe M, Lescay Mevil Y, Glenny AM. Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001476.pub2 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomised trials, 390 participants.
30
Biesbrock AR, He T, Zou Y, Grender JM, Amini P, Sagel PA, Groth A, Klukowska M. Randomized clinical trial evaluating kinetic benefits of desensitizing agents: magnitude, onset, and stability of relief. Journal of Periodontology. 2025. doi:10.1002/JPER.24-0688 Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 120 adults, eight weeks plus a three-week washout; funded by Procter & Gamble.
31
Gormley AJ, Walsh T, Twigg J, Farrugia C, Pollard A, Bullock B, West NX. Dentifrice formulations for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Periodontology 2000. 2026. doi:10.1111/prd.70088 Systematic review and network meta-analysis, 93 randomised trials.
32
Martins CC, Firmino RT, Riva JJ, Ge L, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Colunga-Lozano LE, Granville-Garcia AF, Costa FO, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Zhang Y, Schünemann HJ. Desensitizing Toothpastes for Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Network Meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2020. doi:10.1177/0022034520903036 Systematic review and network meta-analysis, 125 randomised trials.
33
Hu ML, Zheng G, Lin H, Yang M, Zhang YD, Han JM. Network meta-analysis on the effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity. Journal of Dentistry. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.008 Network meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials.
34
Petersson LG. The role of fluoride in the preventive management of dentin hypersensitivity and root caries. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0916-9 Narrative review with a stated literature search.
35
Makeeva IM, Polyakova MA, Doroshina VY, Sokhova IA, Arakelyan MG, Makeeva MK. [Efficiency of paste and suspension with nano-hydroxyapatite on the sensitivity of teeth with gingival recession] (Russian). Stomatologiia (Moskva), 97(4). 2018. doi:10.17116/stomat20189704123 Non-randomised clinical trial, 40 adults with gingival recession, 14 days.
36
NHS. Toothache. https://www.nhs.uk/symptoms/toothache/ Accessed 2026-09-10.
37
Addy M. Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity - are they associated?. International Dental Journal. 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00063.x Narrative review; funding not stated.